On Page Navigation
On Page Navigation
SurveyMonkey publishes thirty dollars a user a month and will not sell you fewer than three seats. Alchemer publishes fifty five and will not sell you more than three. Microsoft Forms costs nothing, because it is already inside a subscription you hold. Qualtrics publishes nothing at all. On all four, the tool turns out to be the cheap part.
Before you pick one and start writing questions in it
All four of these will collect an answer correctly and show you the results. They diverge on what they count and where they stop, and the gap only becomes visible on the day a fourth colleague needs access or the responses have to reach another system. Three questions are worth settling before you commit.
1
SurveyMonkey meters seats with a floor of three and responses with an annual ceiling. Alchemer meters seats with a ceiling of three and responses per account. Qualtrics meters interactions, which means responses, calls, chats and emails, and includes unlimited users. Microsoft Forms publishes no meter at all. Those are four different questions about your business, and the cheapest answer changes depending on which one you are.
2
SurveyMonkey holds white label branding, multilingual surveys and crosstabs for Team Premier at ninety two a user, and single sign on for Enterprise. Alchemer caps every self serve plan at three users and reserves the API for quoted platform accounts. Qualtrics varies what it offers by industry security review. Work out which tier you actually need first, then compare prices, or you will compare the wrong two numbers.
3
Every vendor here ships a question editor and every one of them is good. The real question is whether anybody in your business has the time to decide what is worth asking, word it so the answer means something, and send the next round on schedule. A survey tool collects whatever you point it at. It does not notice that nobody has pointed it at anything since March.
SurveyMonkey and Alchemer both put figures on the page and stand behind them. Microsoft Forms is free inside a subscription you already hold. Qualtrics publishes nothing and routes you to a form. Even the two that publish are not directly comparable, because one sets a floor of three seats and the other sets a ceiling of three. That is not a scandal. It does mean the comparison you are actually making is about who does the asking rather than what the tool costs.
VS
Three Seat Minimum
Thirty A User A Month
Fifty Thousand Responses
SurveyMonkey is the most recognised name here and the one most people try first. Team Advantage is thirty dollars a user a month and Team Premier is ninety two, both billed annually, and their own FAQ says plainly that team plans require a minimum of three users. So ninety a month is the real floor rather than thirty, and responses are capped at fifty thousand a year.
Learn More
VS
No Price At All
Bundled With Microsoft 365
No Limits Published
Microsoft Forms is free and very often already paid for, and on price it beats everything else on this page including us. It is bundled into Microsoft 365 and free with a personal account. The trade is at the other end. Its product page publishes no response limit of any kind, and it describes nothing that writes an answer onto a customer record or opens a ticket from a poor score.
Learn More
VS
No Price On The Page
Metered On Interactions
Unlimited Users Included
Qualtrics publishes no figure anywhere and bills on interactions, which it defines as records collected or processed, including survey responses, call records, chats and emails. Against that it has the most generous user licensing on this hub by a distance, because users are unlimited on every product and every suite. Predicting the annual bill, and getting a bill at all without a sales cycle, is the hard part.
Learn More
VS
Self Serve Caps At Three Users
Fifty Five A User A Month
The API Needs A Quote
Alchemer draws its line at three people. Collaborator is fifty five dollars a user a month, Professional a hundred and sixty five and Full Access two hundred and seventy five, and the upper two carry the words max three users beside the price. Passing three means a quoted platform account, and so does the API. That makes Alchemer the strongest of the four for one or two researchers and the most awkward for a team that grows.
Learn More
What the flat three hundred covers, and what it does not
Three hundred dollars a month, per organization, to decide what the survey is for, write the questions, build the logic and branding, distribute it, watch the responses arrive and revise the whole thing as your questions change. Your Zoho Survey subscription stays in your name and you buy it from Zoho directly. We do not resell it and we do not mark it up.
Here is the qualification, and it is a blunt one. Microsoft Forms is free and you very likely already have it. Alchemer for one person is fifty five dollars. Our fee is three hundred on top of a licence you are also paying for. If somebody in your building will genuinely own the asking, use the free tool and keep your money. What we sell is the writing and the running, not the software.
A survey with forty questions on it is an interview nobody agreed to. We start from what you would change if the answer came back badly, work back to the handful of questions that would tell you, and write each one so it cannot lead the person answering it.
Every paid vendor on this page meters something, whether that is seats, responses or interactions, so the cost tracks your growth. Ours does not. Three hundred a month covers the work whether four colleagues need the results or forty, and the only metered cost you carry is the one you pay Zoho.
A survey programme does not fail loudly. Nothing errors, the tool keeps working, and the next send simply does not happen because everybody was busy. We hold the schedule, chase the people who did not reply, and retire the surveys nobody has read since the quarter they were written.
How do you compare four survey tools when they all count different things?
You work out your own numbers first, then price against them. Decide how many colleagues need access, how many responses you expect in a year, and whether the answers have to reach another system. SurveyMonkey is thirty a user a month on Advantage and ninety two on Premier, three seats minimum. Alchemer is fifty five, a hundred and sixty five or two hundred and seventy five a user, three seats maximum. Microsoft Forms is free. Qualtrics routes you to a form. Ask each for an annual figure at your real numbers, and compare those rather than the ones on the page.
How does a survey tool decision go wrong?
Almost never on the software. It goes wrong on ownership and on follow through. The first round goes out and gets a good response, the second is late, the third never happens, and the answers to the first are still in an export nobody has opened. Six months later the programme is a folder on a shared drive. The tool did not fail. Nobody was running it.
Who owns the account and the subscription if you set this up?
You do, entirely. You hold your own Zoho Survey subscription in your own name and you pay Zoho directly for it. We work inside it as administrators. If you end this tomorrow the account, every question set, every response and all the reporting stay exactly where they are, and we hand back the administrator seat.
Should we simply use one of these instead?
For a lot of businesses, yes, and we would rather say it here than after you have signed. If somebody will genuinely write and run the asking, Microsoft Forms is free and already in your tenant, and one Alchemer seat is fifty five dollars. Use those. Come back if that person turns out not to exist, or turns out to be too busy by March.
Which one actually comes out cheapest?
Microsoft Forms, always, because it is free and there is no arrangement under which that changes. After that it depends on your shape. For one researcher, Alchemer Collaborator at fifty five is the cheapest paid option. For three or more people who all need access, SurveyMonkey at ninety a month beats Alchemer, which will not sell you a fourth seat at all. We are more expensive than any of them. Three hundred a month is a management fee sitting on top of a licence you are already paying for.
What happens when a survey stops going out after the rollout?
On a subscription, first somebody has to notice, and that is the part that fails. No vendor support tier covers it, because nothing is broken. Alchemer gives Collaborator customers email support and holds phone support for annual Professional and Full Access plans. SurveyMonkey puts phone support on Premier. With us, holding the schedule is part of the fee, so the noticing is ours rather than yours.
Do we have to rewrite every survey at once?
No, and it usually goes better if you do not. The normal order is the customer facing survey first, because that is the one with a decision attached to it, then the recurring internal ones, then the long tail of forms nobody has read in months. Most of the value sits in the first group and most of the volume sits in the last.
Can you take over a survey programme somebody else built?
Often, and it is real work rather than a tidy up. We read what is there, find the same thing asked two different ways in two different places, identify the rounds that quietly stopped, and settle which wording wins. Expect that last part to be the bulk of it. Inherited programmes are usually accurate about what was asked and silent about what anybody did with the answers.
How long does this actually take to set up?
Four to eight weeks for most businesses, and longer where the audience lists live in three systems that disagree about who the customer is. The survey itself is a day or two of thinking and an afternoon of building. The time goes on agreeing what you are trying to learn, and on the contact data that turns out to need cleaning before anything can be sent.
We already have somebody who runs our surveys. What is left for you?
Possibly nothing, and that is a fine answer. Somebody who owns this properly will do it better than a monthly retainer, because they are there every day. The question is whether it is actually on their list. Sending the next round of a survey that went fine last time is the work that is always reasonable to postpone until next week.
When would you tell us to walk away?
Two cases, and both are common. If your questions are internal and occasional, Microsoft Forms is sitting there already paid for, and if somebody will use it the money is better spent elsewhere. And if you ask your customers something once a year and read the answers over a coffee, that is genuinely fine and we will say so.
What if asking turns out not to be the problem?
We raise it before you have paid us anything, because that is what the fit review is for. Often the real problem is that nobody is empowered to act on what customers say, or that marketing and support hold opposite views of who is being served, or that the answers are already known and unwelcome. Those are the things to deal with first, and no survey will fix any of them.
What does this cost through you, stated plainly?
Three hundred dollars a month, per organization, as published on the Managed Zoho Survey service page. Response volume does not change it and neither does headcount. The Zoho Survey licence itself you buy from Zoho, and it remains yours.
What happens if we decide to leave?
Thirty days notice ends it. Everything stays exactly where it is, because the subscription was always yours. We hand back the administrator seat, write up every question set and why each question is worded as it is so the next person is not guessing, and list the sends we would keep running.
What do you need from us to start?
A rough list of the ways you already ask customers things, and an honest account of what you would change if the answers came back badly. That second list is never complete and does not need to be. It tells us the shape of the problem, and the fit review finds the rest.
