On Page Navigation
On Page Navigation
Not one of these four will tell you what it costs without a sales call. Two of them show no price anywhere on the site, and one sends its own pricing URL to a page about company size instead. All four then switch the system on and leave the policy decisions to whoever has time. That last part is the whole job.
Before you book the demo
Most businesses shopping for an HR system are not actually unhappy with their HR system. Onboarding happens differently depending on who runs it, leave balances get argued about every quarter, and nobody can say with confidence which policy the handbook actually commits the company to. Those are process problems wearing a software costume, and if the answer is somebody who owns the policy afterwards, what managed Zoho People actually covers is set out in full.
1
None of the four publishes a figure. Paylocity describes every module it sells in detail and then ends the page in a form, with Get Pricing as the only button on it. Paycor goes further and redirects its own pricing address to a page about company size. ADP puts a request button beside Workforce Now in eleven places and a number beside none of them. Personio at least names its two plans, Core and CorePro, and publishes a full feature table, but both plans read Book a demo where the price belongs, and the one-time setup fee is described as depending on company size without saying what it is. Ask for the number in writing on the first call rather than the third.
2
A licence hands you an employee database and a login. Somebody still has to write the leave policy the system will enforce, decide what happens to an approval when the manager is away, build the onboarding checklist, set how long documents are kept, and produce the headcount report the owner keeps asking for, and on every platform here that somebody is you or a consultant billed separately. Get the policy wrong in the first quarter and you find out when an employee disputes a leave balance in writing. The same gap runs through every comparison we publish.
3
Standing the system up is the easy half and all four will do that part with you. What repeats forever is the upkeep. Retiring an approval rule that still routes to a manager who left, rewriting the onboarding checklist after the process quietly changed, correcting an org chart that has been wrong since the last reorganisation, and reading the absence data closely enough to notice a pattern before it turns into a grievance. None of the four does any of that for you. Ask who is doing it once the implementation consultant has moved on.
Four platforms, not one published price between them, and on at least one a setup fee that is also unquoted.
VS
No Price On The Pricing Page
Payroll, HR, Finance And IT In One
Modules Bought One At A Time
Paylocity publishes a pricing page that describes what it sells in unusual detail and never once says what any of it costs. The page walks through payroll, human resources, time and labour, talent, benefits, employee experience and the marketplace integrations, and then ends in a form under a Get Pricing button. Modules are bought individually, so the shape of your bill depends on which ones you take rather than on a tier you can read off a page. Paylocity is a serious American platform with real payroll, tax filing and benefits administration behind it, and it says implementation support is included from the first day. What you cannot do is compare it against anything until somebody has quoted you.
Learn More
VS
The Pricing Page Redirects Away
Aimed At Small And Medium Employers
Payroll And HR On One Contract
Paycor is the clearest version of the pattern this page is about. Ask for its pricing page and you do not get one. The pricing address redirects to a page organised by how many employees you have, which opens with stress-free HR and payroll for medium and small businesses and an offer to show you an insider's view. Paycor says more than forty thousand businesses use it, and for a small American employer that wants payroll, tax filing and HR on a single contract it earns a place on the shortlist. We are not quoting a figure here, because at the time of writing there is no figure published to quote. Every number you would want for a comparison arrives through a salesperson.
Learn More
VS
Eleven Buttons And No Numbers
The One Your Accountant Already Knows
Quoted Only Through A Salesperson
ADP Workforce Now is the incumbent, and the incumbency is most of the argument for it. It is the platform your accountant, your broker and your benefits carriers already know how to work with, which quietly removes a whole category of integration problem the others have to solve. The product page runs through payroll, HR, talent, benefits and time, and places a pricing request button beside all of it in eleven separate places without printing a figure next to any of them. That is a deliberate model rather than an oversight, because an ADP quote turns on headcount, pay frequency, which states you run payroll in and which modules you take. It also means the only route to comparing ADP with anything else here is to open a sales conversation.
Learn More
VS
Two Named Plans, Neither Priced
A Setup Fee Also Left Unquoted
Core Caps Signatures At Eight Percent
Personio comes closest to transparency and still stops short of a number. It names two plans, Core and CorePro, and publishes a genuinely detailed table of what separates them, so you can see precisely what you would be buying. What the table has no row for is price. Both columns read Book a demo. The differences themselves are real: Core covers a single legal entity, caps electronic signatures at eight percent of your headcount, and leaves out API access, position management and workforce planning, all of which arrive with CorePro. Every active user counts towards your licence total, paying annually in advance saves ten percent, and the minimum term is twelve months. There is also a one-time setup fee, which Personio says depends on company size without saying what it is. It is built for ten to ten thousand employees and it is European, so American payroll is not the job it was designed for.
Learn More
What seven hundred covers
Managed Zoho People is not a subscription with our name on the invoice. You buy your Zoho licences from Zoho and we do not resell them, so the price you see is the price you pay. Seven hundred dollars a month buys the work that sits on top of it: the employee record structure, onboarding and offboarding workflows, attendance and leave rules, timesheets, performance review cycles, document compliance, and integration with the rest of your Zoho environment. If the business grows past what an HR app on its own can carry and starts needing payroll and the employee record sitting inside the same system as everything else, the managed Frappe HR service is where that conversation goes next.
All four platforms above are quoted rather than priced, and that changes what comparing them even means. You cannot lay four numbers side by side, because there are no four numbers to lay out. What you can compare is the shape of the thing each one will eventually quote against, and in every case it is your headcount. Personio states it plainly and counts every active user towards your licence total. Paylocity sells its modules one at a time, so a quote turns as much on which parts you take as on how many people you employ. The practical consequence is the same either way. The figure moves when you hire, and it moves again at renewal. Ask what it does at twice your current headcount before you sign anything at your current one.
The other thing worth saying outright is that three of these four run American payroll and we do not. Paylocity, Paycor and ADP will file your payroll taxes, work through the multi-state cases and administer your benefits, and Zoho People is not a payroll product in the United States. If what you actually need is payroll with an HR system attached to it, one of those three is the right answer and this page is not going to pretend otherwise. What we do is the other half of the job: the employee record, the policies, the approvals, the leave rules, the reviews and the documents, owned by somebody whose actual job it is. Plenty of businesses end up with a payroll provider on one side and somebody running the HR system on the other, and that is a sensible arrangement rather than a failure to decide.
Underneath all of it is a question about who does the upkeep. Every platform here will draw you a clean org chart and not one of them will mention that the chart has been wrong since the last reorganisation. An approval that still routes to somebody who left, a leave rule the system enforces differently from the way the handbook words it, an onboarding checklist naming a tool nobody uses any more, and review cycles that quietly stopped running two years ago all add up to a tidy looking system sitting over an HR function that cannot answer a straight question. An employee record nobody trusts is worse than a spreadsheet, because it looks official. How much of that work somebody in the business can absorb is the real question, and owners tend to be optimistic about it.
An HR system switched on changes nothing on its own. The leave policy the system will enforce, what happens to an approval while a manager is away, the onboarding checklist, how long documents are kept and the headcount report the owner keeps asking for decide whether any of it works, and every one of those is a decision rather than a setting. We read how the business already handles its people before any of it gets configured.
Every platform on this page quotes against your headcount, and not one of them prints the figure where you can find it. Seven hundred dollars a month covers the employee record structure, the onboarding and offboarding workflows, the attendance and leave rules, the timesheets, the review cycles, the document compliance and the integrations across your Zoho environment. That number is on this page rather than behind a form, and it does not change depending on who is reading it or how many people you told us you employ.
An HR problem rarely announces itself either. Leave carries on accruing, the records still look complete, and the gap surfaces when somebody disputes a balance in writing or an auditor asks which version of the policy was in force in March. Watching the rules, the approvals and the integrations is part of the fee rather than something bought separately afterwards.
How do you compare four platforms that will not publish a price?
You compare what each one is willing to tell you before you talk to a salesperson, because for now that is the only thing you can actually see. Personio names two plans and publishes a full feature table with no price in it. Paylocity describes every module it sells and ends the page in a form. ADP puts a pricing request button beside the product in eleven places. Paycor redirects its pricing address to a page about company size. Ask each one for a written figure at your headcount and see which answers fastest, because how long that takes tells you something about the rest of the relationship.
How does an HR software decision go wrong?
Rarely on the software. It goes wrong on the policy, which nobody quotes for. The platform gets bought, each manager approves leave the way they always did, and nine months later the system says one thing, the handbook says another and an employee has noticed. The licence bills the whole time. Ask who is writing the rules the system will enforce before you ask what it costs.
Who owns the employee data if you set it up for us?
You do, and it is not a clause we negotiated for you. The Zoho account is in your name and billed to you, we do not resell the licences, and every policy, workflow, form and report we build stays inside it. Stop paying us and nothing switches off. That matters more with employee records than with most systems, because the obligation to hold them correctly stays with you no matter who configured the thing.
Is it cheaper to just buy one of these instead?
We cannot tell you, and neither can they until you call. That is the honest answer and it is the reason this page exists. What we can say is that for a very small employer the answer is almost certainly yes, and that if you need American payroll filed for you then three of the four are doing a job we do not do at all. What no quote you receive will include is somebody writing the leave policy, keeping the approvals matched to who actually works here now, and maintaining it after the implementation consultant has gone.
Does any of these four publish a price at all?
No. Not one of the four, which is unusual enough to be the reason this page is organised the way it is. Personio gets closest by naming Core and CorePro and publishing a full comparison table, then leaves both price cells reading Book a demo and adds a one-time setup fee described only as depending on company size. Paylocity documents every module in detail under a Get Pricing button. ADP repeats a pricing request button eleven times beside Workforce Now. Paycor sends its pricing address to a page about how many employees you have. Our figure is seven hundred dollars a month and it is on this page.
What happens when something breaks after we go live with this?
On a licence the software is supported and the configuration is not, and almost everything that goes wrong is configuration. A leave rule accruing at the wrong rate for one office is not a bug their support desk can fix, because somebody chose that setting. Here it is one company and one number, fixes sit inside the fee rather than being quoted for, and when Zoho ships a change that breaks a workflow you depend on, that is our problem before it is yours.
Do we have to move every employee record at once?
No, and most should not. The usual order is the active employee records and the leave balances first, because those are the two things people notice immediately if they are wrong. Onboarding workflows and review cycles follow once the records are trusted. Historic files for people who have left can be imported later or held where they are, subject to whatever retention rule you are working to. Moving everything on the same Monday is how a payroll cutoff gets missed.
Can you take over a Zoho People somebody else set up?
Often, and it is real work rather than a tidy up. We read the employee forms, the leave types and accrual rules, the approval chains, the onboarding checklists and the automations nobody remembers writing, then say plainly what is worth keeping. Leave balances get checked against what people believe they have, because that is where inherited systems are usually wrong and where being wrong costs the most.
How long before the HR system actually runs itself?
Four to eight weeks for most businesses, and longer where attendance, timesheets and review cycles are all in scope. The records and the leave rules come first, then the workflows, then the reporting that makes the whole thing worth having. Configuration starts the week we begin rather than after a discovery phase that bills separately. What people notice first is rarely the software. It is that nobody is arguing about leave balances any more.
We already have an HR manager. What is left for you?
Quite possibly nothing, and that is a fine answer. A good HR manager who owns the policy is most of this. Where we tend to be useful alongside one is the parts that are not HR work at all: the form and field design, the approval logic, the integration into the rest of Zoho so a new hire reaches the systems they need on day one, the reporting that answers what the owner keeps asking, and the automations nobody has time to maintain. Plenty of clients keep their HR manager and hire us for the system around them.
When should you not hire us for HR work?
Two cases, and both are common. If you need American payroll run and filed, that is the job three of these four do and we do not, so buy one of them. And if you employ six people who all sit in one room, an HR platform of any kind is probably solving a problem you do not have yet, and a shared calendar plus a written leave policy will hold for another year.
What if the software is not what is actually wrong?
We will say so before taking your money, and the fit review costs nothing. HR functions that feel chaotic are usually chaotic because the policy was never written down properly, not because the system is slow. A fair number of these conversations end with a rewritten handbook, one person made responsible for approvals, and no new software at all.
What does this actually cost through you, in writing?
One flat monthly rate of seven hundred dollars, listed on the managed Zoho People page and on this one. It covers the employee record structure, onboarding and offboarding workflows, attendance and leave, timesheets, performance review cycles, document compliance and integration with the rest of your Zoho environment. Your Zoho licences sit outside that and are billed to you by Zoho, because we do not resell them. Nothing in our figure moves when you hire somebody.
What happens if we want to leave you?
Thirty days notice ends it and nothing is stranded. The Zoho account, the employee records and the leave history were always yours and always billed to you, so there is no migration and nothing to hand back. What stops is us. Payroll cutoffs, leave approvals and onboarding carry on exactly as they did the day before, which where people's pay and time off are concerned is the only acceptable answer.
What do you need from us to start?
Wherever employee records live now, read access to them, your current leave policy in whatever state it is in, and an hour with whoever people actually ask when they have a question. The walk through takes a few days and costs nothing, and it ends with a plain answer about whether Zoho People suits the business or whether you are better off where you are.
