On Page Navigation
On Page Navigation
None of these four publishes a price, and each one declines for a different reason that tells you which kind of school it was built to sell to. What none of them offers is a student system your school owns outright, with admissions, fees and the portal built around how you already enroll and bill, and one company answerable for it afterwards.
Where to start
Most schools shopping for a student system already know what is not working. The real fee figures live in a spreadsheet beside the system, or admissions is three forms and an inbox and nobody can say who has replied. Those are configuration problems rather than licence problems, and if the answer is a student system you own and somebody else runs, what managed Frappe Education actually covers is set out in full.
1
PowerSchool sells to public K-12 districts and builds its case on state reporting. Blackbaud sells to private and independent K-12 schools, where fundraising and tuition billing sit alongside the student record. Ellucian sells to higher education at enterprise scale. Jenzabar sells to higher education further down the size curve. Those are four different buyers, and a grid comparing all four against each other flatters whichever one you were already leaning towards.
2
A licence hands you an empty instance and an admin login. Somebody still has to decide the programme and term structure, the admission workflow, the fee schedules and instalment rules, who may open a full student record and who may only see a class list, and what the portal shows a parent. On every vendor here that somebody is you, a contractor, or a professional services line quoted separately. It is the work that decides whether the thing gets used in September, and the licence figure never covers it. The same gap runs through every comparison on this site.
3
Standing a student system up is the easy half, and every vendor here manages it. What changes afterwards is the invoice. Blackbaud licenses seven school products separately and names organisation size, user count and module selection as inputs to the quote. Jenzabar One wraps an ERP and a student system around thirteen products, with training, cloud, implementation and managed resources sold as four separate lines. Ellucian groups its services into three named tiers. Ask what one more programme does to the figure before you sign, and get the answer in writing.
Four vendors, four different buyers, and one shared habit of not publishing a price. Two sell to K-12 and two sell to higher education, and the split inside each pair matters as much as the split between them.
VS
Public K-12 Districts
Pricing Page Returns A 404
State Reporting Is The Moat
PowerSchool is the public K-12 district vendor, at more than five thousand three hundred districts, and its pricing page returns a 404. What it publishes instead is a K-12 buying guide and a Help Me Choose walkthrough, and every route ends at Speak to an Expert or See It in Action. There is no free plan, no trial and no self serve path of any kind. Two student systems sit under the name, PowerSchool SIS and eSchoolPlus SIS, alongside a State Data Solution sold to whole states. Its support story is a peer community of thousands of districts rather than a named success manager. State reporting changes every year and PowerSchool tracks it, which is the one thing on this page Frappe Education does not do.
Learn More
VS
Private And Independent K-12
Publishes The Method, Not The Number
Seven Products, Licensed Separately
Blackbaud sells to private and independent K-12 schools and has done for forty years, which is a different school from PowerSchool's and a different set of problems. It is the only vendor here that publishes its pricing method without publishing a price, and it names four inputs: organisation size, number of users, which of the seven school products you select, and the level of support and services you want. The quote typically folds in implementation, training and ongoing support, and they state there are no hidden fees. Support runs through a dedicated customer success manager, technical cover around the clock and a peer community of five thousand K-12 schools. Seven products licensed separately is the part worth modelling before the call.
Learn More
VS
Higher Education, Enterprise Scale
An ROI Calculator And No Cost
Gartner Leader Two Years Running
Ellucian is the higher education enterprise vendor and the largest name here. It publishes no cost of any kind, and in place of one it publishes a value calculator that will estimate what you stand to gain. That is half a ratio, and it is a deliberate choice about which half of the conversation happens first. The student side spans recruiting and admissions, student aid, student success, lifelong learning, curriculum and the record itself, with HCM and finance alongside. Services arrive in three named groups, Professional, Success and Managed. They self report a billion dollars in SaaS research spend, twenty one million students and seventy four percent of HBCUs, and Gartner has named them a leader for higher education SaaS student systems two years running.
Learn More
VS
Higher Education, Mid Market
Publishes Nothing At All
Every Button Is Request A Demo
Jenzabar publishes less than anybody else on this page. No price, no tiers, no rate card and no bands, and every call to action on the site is Request A Demo. It sells to higher education further down the size curve than Ellucian, and Jenzabar One bundles an ERP and a student system with thirteen products around them. Integration comes through the Jenzabar One API and Unity Platform, a low code layer powered by Boomi. Training and support, cloud services, implementation services and managed resources are four separately named service lines, which tells you the licence was never going to be the whole figure. Three decades in higher education is the claim, and a demo is the only way to find out what any of it costs.
Learn More
About the service
Managed Frappe Education is not a licence with our name on the invoice. Your school owns the instance, the student records and the source code, the programmes, fee schedules, admission workflow and portal are built around how you already enroll and bill, and one company is answerable for the configuration, the Frappe Cloud hosting and the support afterwards. If the student records are only part of it and the finance or HR side is the real problem, our managed ERPNext service is usually the better place to start.
All four decline to publish a price, and the four reasons are not the same reason. Blackbaud publishes the method and withholds the number. Ellucian publishes a calculator that estimates your return and never mentions cost. PowerSchool publishes a buying guide and a pricing page that returns a 404. Jenzabar publishes nothing at all and routes every click to a demo request. Four vendors, one billing model and four unrelated arguments, which is what happens when a category is really four categories sharing a name.
The honest limit on our side is state reporting. A public district files to its state every year, the required fields change every year, and PowerSchool employs people whose job is to track that and ship the updates before the deadline. Frappe Education does not do this, and we are not going to build a state submission pipeline for one district. If you are a public K-12 district with reporting obligations, buy from somebody who already carries that burden. That is a real gap and it is stated here rather than buried.
Underneath all of it is a question about who owns the structure. On a licensed platform the vendor decides what a programme, a fee schedule and an enrollment can be, and the answer changes when they ship. On an open source system you decide, which is more work and more control. Whether that trade is worth making depends on how ordinary your admissions and billing actually are, and outside the state reporting case most of it is more ordinary than people expect.
A student system switched on changes nothing on its own. Programme and term structure, the admission workflow and who approves what, fee schedules and instalment rules, who may open a full student record and who may only see a class list, and what the portal shows a parent all decide whether the thing gets used in September. Every one of those is a decision rather than a setting. We read how you already enroll and bill before any of it gets configured.
All four of these size the quote on how big you already are, so growth and the bill are the same event. One thousand a month covers configuration, student and course data migration, programme and fee structure, admin training, Frappe Cloud hosting and the support queue, and adding another four hundred students does not touch it. For a school of eighty that is more than a small vendor would charge. For a college of four thousand it is not.
A fee schedule that has quietly stopped matching what the school actually charges does not announce itself. It runs, it produces invoices that look correct, and the gap turns up when a parent queries a figure nobody in the office can explain. Watching the schedules, the instalment rules and the term rollover is part of the fee rather than something bought separately afterwards.
What is the best student information system for a small school?
There is no answer that survives contact with the kind of school you actually run, because these four were not built for the same buyer. PowerSchool is public K-12 districts and state reporting. Blackbaud is private and independent K-12, where fundraising and tuition sit next to the record. Ellucian is higher education at enterprise scale. Jenzabar is higher education further down the size curve. Frappe Education is open source, so the software costs nothing and what you pay for is the work.
How does a student information system decision go wrong?
Rarely on the software. It goes wrong on the configuration and the data migration, which the licence figure never covers. The system gets bought, an admin login arrives, and a term later the office is still keeping the real fee figures in a spreadsheet beside it. The licence bills the whole time. Ask who is doing that work, and what it costs, before you ask what the licence costs.
Who owns the platform if you implement it for us?
You do, and on Frappe Education that is a property of the software rather than a clause we agreed to. The instance is yours, the student records and their history are yours, the source code is open, and every programme, fee schedule and permission rule we configure stays with you. Stop paying us and the system keeps running. On a licensed platform the data is exportable, but the software itself stops.
Is it cheaper to just license one of these instead?
Very possibly, and not one of them will tell you, which is the honest problem with the question. None of the four publishes a figure we could put beside ours. Blackbaud names the four things that set its quote, so we can tell you what they are but not what they add up to. Ellucian and Jenzabar publish nothing. PowerSchool has a pricing page that returns a 404. So we are not going to invent a break even point for you. What we can say is that our figure does not move with enrollment and every one of theirs does.
Which of these vendors will actually show you a price?
None of them, and the four refusals are worth telling apart. Blackbaud publishes its method and withholds the number, which at least lets you prepare for the call. Ellucian publishes a value calculator that estimates your return and never mentions cost. PowerSchool publishes a buying guide and a pricing page that returns a 404. Jenzabar publishes nothing whatsoever and every button asks for a demo. We publish one thousand and two thousand, which is not a virtue so much as a different sales model.
What happens when something breaks after the first month?
On a licensed platform the software is supported and the configuration is not, and almost everything that goes wrong is configuration. A fee rule that applies a sibling discount twice is not a bug their support desk can fix. Here it is one company and one number, fixes sit inside the fee rather than being quoted for, and when an upstream Frappe Education release changes something that affects you, that is our problem before it is yours.
Do we have to move every record at once?
No, and most schools should not. Admissions and the current student record usually go first, because the office touches them every day and the improvement shows inside a term. Fees, assessment and the portal follow once somebody has decided what each of them is actually for. Running one intake through the new system while the old one keeps the historic years is normal rather than a compromise.
Can you take over a Frappe Education instance somebody else set up?
Often, and it is real work rather than a tidy up. We read the programme and term structure, the fee schedules, the admission workflow, the permission model and every customization somebody added, then say plainly what is worth keeping. Occasionally the honest answer is a clean instance with the student records and their history migrated across.
How long before people are actually using it?
Four to eight weeks for most schools, and longer where historic student records have to be restructured rather than imported. Configuration starts the week we begin, not after a discovery phase that bills separately. What the office notices first is rarely the software. It is that the class lists and the fee run come from the same place and nobody is reconciling two spreadsheets.
We have someone technical in house. What is left for you to do?
Standing the software up is a morning of work and Frappe Cloud will host it for a modest monthly fee, so if that were the job you would not need us. The time goes into programme and term structure, fee and instalment design, the admission workflow and the permission model, and into the awkward cases nobody thinks about first. A student who transfers halfway through a term. A sibling discount that applies to two of three children. A programme two departments both believe they own.
When should you not hire us for this at all?
Two cases, and both are common. If you take one intake a year, teach sixty students and have a bursar who knows every family by name, a spreadsheet and a decent habit are genuinely fine and we will say so. If you are a public district filing state submissions every year, PowerSchool has built exactly that and Frappe Education has not, so buy theirs.
What if the software is not the real problem?
We will say so before taking your money, and the fit review costs nothing. A student system built around an admissions process nobody has questioned in ten years only files the mess more tidily. A fair number of these conversations end with two fee schedules being merged, one form being deleted, and no new software at all.
What does this actually cost if we go through you?
Two flat monthly tiers, both listed on the managed Frappe Education page. Standard at one thousand a month covers configuration, student and course data migration, programme and fee structure, admin training, Frappe Cloud hosting and ongoing support. Priority at two thousand adds two concurrent requests, faster turnaround and a quarterly review of programmes, fee schedules and permissions. Neither tier counts students.
What happens if we want to leave later?
Thirty days notice ends it and nothing is stranded. The instance, the student records and their history were always yours, so there is no migration and nothing to hand back. What stops is us. That is a harder offer for a licensed platform to make, because there the software is the thing that stops.
What do you need from us before we start?
Whatever the student data currently lives in, your fee schedule and the rules around it, a list of who is allowed to see what, and an hour with the person in the office who fixes everything by hand. The walk through takes a few days and costs nothing, and it ends with a plain answer about whether Frappe Education suits the school.
