On Page Navigation

A ScreenConnect Alternative for Teams Sizing Two Licences at Once

ConnectWise ScreenConnect prices remote support by concurrent technician licence and unattended access by agent volume, and those are two separate purchases on two separate meters. Managed Zoho Assist is three hundred dollars a month with the Zoho Assist licence carried on our invoice. Their entry licence is twenty eight dollars a month, and we deal with that gap further down.
What ScreenConnect costs, and the choice that comes before the price
Twenty eight dollars a month opens the door, and then you pick which meter you are billed on
ScreenConnect publishes both of its price lists, which is more than parts of this hub manage. Remote Support runs twenty eight, forty three or fifty three dollars a month per concurrent technician licence on an annual term. Unattended Access is a separate product priced by how many agents you deploy, from thirty one dollars a month for twenty five agents up to twelve hundred and ninety one for two and a half thousand. Working out which of those you are buying, and how much of it, is the actual exercise.
Icon representing two separately priced products bought on two different meters

There are two licensing models and you choose before you price anything

Remote Support is concurrent, so you buy technician licences and the meter counts live sessions. Unattended Access is agent based, so you buy a volume of installed agents and simultaneous sessions stop being the constraint. They are different products with different price lists, and for a lot of teams the honest answer turns out to be some of each.
Icon representing one technician working inside a concurrent licence at a time

On the concurrent tiers, one licence is one technician at a time

Remote Support One allows a single simultaneous session and caps the whole account at one technician licence. Standard lifts that cap and reaches three simultaneous sessions. Premium reaches ten. On all three the number of simultaneous technicians per licence is still one, so working in parallel is a thing you buy rather than a thing you have.
Icon representing unattended access priced by how many agents are installed

Unattended access is priced by how many machines carry an agent

Twenty five agents is thirty one dollars a month on an annual term, a hundred is a hundred and three, five hundred is three hundred and eighty seven, and two and a half thousand is twelve hundred and ninety one. The rate per agent falls steeply as the count climbs, which rewards knowing the real number rather than the comfortable one.
Two published price lists, and a sizing decision sitting on top of both
Buying the licences is the easy half. Deciding who may reach which machine is the half nobody sells.
ScreenConnect costs less than we do, and at a modest agent count it costs a great deal less. What neither price list settles is which computers deserve a standing agent, how many sessions your shift pattern really needs open at once, which of the two licensing models fits the way your team actually works, and who takes the access back on the day a technician leaves. None of that appears on either page, and buying both products answers none of it.

Cascadia

The licensing decision made for you, access rules built around who may connect to what, standing agents deployed only where they earn their place, technicians provisioned the week they start and removed the week they go, and every session landing on a Zoho Desk ticket. Three hundred dollars a month, month to month, with the Zoho Assist licence carried on our invoice and nothing counted.

Without Cascadia

Two products to size, a parallel session count to guess before you commit, an agent volume band to pick and then grow into, and two renewals running on their own schedules. Everything past the purchase is still yours to plan and run.

Comparison

Cascadia vs ScreenConnect
ScreenConnect publishes both of its rate cards and we are not going to argue about rates, because at a modest agent count theirs lands well below ours. This table compares what each side is responsible for instead. Everything in the Cascadia column is included in Managed Zoho Assist at one flat monthly figure.

Somebody works out whether you are a concurrent licence business or an agent volume business before anything gets bought

Somebody writes the access policy, decides which machines carry a standing agent, and tests what a customer actually sees when a technician asks to come in

A monthly pass over technician accounts, agent coverage and session rules, checked against who joined, who left and what got rebuilt

A price that stays put when you add a technician, a parallel session or another two hundred agents

The same named person on every call, who wrote your access rules and remembers why each one is there

One remote access standard across the whole team, rather than a support licence here and an agent bundle there

A single monthly figure, rather than two product lines renewing on schedules of their own

Ticket, session, notes and customer record sitting in one system instead of stitched together across two

An honest no on the first call if a single Remote Support licence really is the whole answer

A monthly read of who reached which machine, written for you rather than exported and assembled by whoever has the time

Generic logo representing a comparable provider.
ScreenConnect

Where ScreenConnect fits

If your estate is settled, somebody owns the agent list, and you already know how many technicians need to be in a session at once, ScreenConnect is a strong product and it will cost you well under what we do. It gets harder the moment any of those three numbers moves, because then you are re-sizing two products rather than one.
Cascadia Web Services logo

Cascadia Web Services

Where sizing two products stops being the interesting problem

We exist for the business where the connection is the easy part, and the hard part is that support also has to raise tickets, sit against customer records, and prove afterwards who reached what. Once nobody has the hours to build that and keep it built, the licence price stops being the number that decides anything.

Where ScreenConnect is strong

Icon representing a monthly billing option offered alongside the annual one
There is a monthly option, which is rare on this hub
The unattended access price list carries a monthly column alongside the annual one, at roughly a quarter more. Every other product on this hub bills a year at a time. If committing twelve months ahead is the thing stopping you, ScreenConnect is the one here that does not make you.
Icon representing a self hosted deployment kept inside your own network
You can host it yourself, and we cannot offer that at all
Self hosted deployments are arranged through their sales team. If your remote access has to sit inside your own network to satisfy a regulator or a client contract, that is a real requirement and ScreenConnect answers it. Zoho Assist is cloud only, so on that one point we are not a substitute and we will say so on the first call.
Icon representing a free single user licence to start out on
There is a free single user licence to start on
A solo operator can run on a free licence and pay nothing. That is a fair way into the product rather than a trial that expires into a bill. If you are one person looking after a handful of machines, start there rather than anywhere else on this hub, and that includes here.
Icon representing the cost per agent falling as the estate grows
At volume the rate per agent falls a long way
Twenty five agents work out near a dollar and a quarter each a month. At two and a half thousand they are around fifty two cents. A business with a large, well understood estate and somebody already managing it gets very good value from the agent based line, and we are not going to pretend to beat it on rate.
All of that is real, and if your estate is settled and somebody keeps the agent list current, ScreenConnect is a better answer than anything we sell. What it is not is a standing answer to who may reach what six months from now. That is a different job, and it is the one our Managed Zoho work is built around.

What three hundred a month buys when the rate card was never the expensive part

Icon representing one figure covering both product lines and the licence
One figure covering both halves, the licence, and every change afterwards
The licensing model, the technician accounts, the access groups, the standing agents, the session rules, the Desk and CRM wiring, and the Zoho Assist subscription itself. All of it built once and then kept right, with no change request and no hourly rate waiting behind it.
Icon representing a figure that does not move on your busiest day
Nothing is metered, so a second parallel session costs nothing
Three hundred a month covers as many technicians as you have and as many sessions as they run at once. ScreenConnect puts a price on both of those. More parallel work means a higher tier, and more machines means a bigger agent band. Neither of those conversations happens here.
Icon representing the person who sized the licences also answering the phone
The person who sized it is the person who answers the phone
You are not explaining your setup to somebody meeting it for the first time. ScreenConnect support is capable and their documentation is good. Neither of those chose your licensing model or knows why that one server is reachable out of hours.
Icon representing a support session inside the same suite as the ticket and the customer
One suite, so the session is already attached to the ticket
Zoho Assist sits next to Desk, CRM, Projects and People, so a session lands on the ticket and the customer record with nothing in between. ScreenConnect integrates with plenty of tools, which is useful, and an integration is still two systems agreeing rather than one record moving.
ScreenConnect will cost you less than we do and it will do the connecting perfectly well. The line is whether anybody owns the access list. Once technicians come and go, and standing agents outlive the machines they were installed on, the tool stops being the hard part and running it becomes the hard part.

Onboarding process

What the first sixty days look like when the sizing stops being your problem

Most of the work is ours. Anything on this hub will put a technician on a screen. The difference is who chooses the licensing model, who decides which machines deserve a standing agent, and who comes back to both when the business changes shape.

1

Nothing gets bought until we have watched a real support call end to end

We sit with whoever answers the phone, and with whoever they escalate to, and we write down how a machine actually gets reached today rather than how the runbook says it does.

2

We count the machines that genuinely need a standing agent before anything is priced

The computers somebody connects to weekly, the ones that took an agent three years ago and were then forgotten, and the personal accounts still holding access nobody revoked. That count is what decides whether the concurrent line or the agent line is the right one, and it is almost never the number people expect.

3

The groups, the permissions and the agent rules get built around you, not left on defaults

Defaults hand every technician every machine, which is fine right up until it is not. We build the groups, the session permissions and the unattended rules around the way your support actually runs, so what somebody can reach matches what they are there to do.

4

You run a full month on it, including a real out of hours call and a real leaver

The first month of live sessions runs with us alongside it. Anything that fails to connect, asks the customer for the wrong consent, or leaves access standing afterwards gets fixed while the call it happened on is still fresh.

Testimonials

Don't Take Our Word For It

Two situations where the rate card stops being the question
These are scenarios, not client stories. Where a business outgrows what a Zoho estate can carry, the honest next move is managed ERPNext, and we would rather say so early than sell you something you have to leave.
Hands checking figures on a calculator against a stack of invoices

How this plays out

A firm that bought the concurrent line and needed the agent line

Two Remote Support licences looked like the cheap answer, and for a year they were. Then standing agents spread across the estate one machine at a time, and unattended coverage started mattering more than live sessions ever had. The fix was not a higher tier, it was the other product, and nobody had modelled what that would cost until renewal week arrived.
A support agent taking a call at a laptop

When this comes up

A firm where each rate card looked cheap on its own

Remote Support at forty three dollars a month reads as nothing. Two hundred and fifty agents at two hundred and six reads as reasonable. Nobody added the two together against what the support process actually needed, and because the renewals fell in different months the real annual figure never appeared on one page until somebody went looking for it.
300

Dollars a month, printed here, with the Zoho Assist licence inside the figure

Everything from the first read of how support really works through to the monthly session reporting sits inside that number. Unlike the rest of our Zoho work, the Zoho Assist subscription sits in our name and arrives on the same invoice as the fee.
0

Dollars per technician licence, per parallel session or per installed agent

The review, the licensing decision, the access rules, the agent rollout and the reporting all sit inside the three hundred. Nothing is metered, there is no band to grow into and there is no second product to renew.
4-8

Weeks, usually, before support runs on the new setup without us in it

Four to eight weeks typically, and longer where standing agents have been rolled out over several years without anybody keeping a list of which machines took one.

ScreenConnect alternative and managed Zoho Assist FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

How does ScreenConnect compare to TeamViewer, AnyDesk and Splashtop?
It is the only one of the four that publishes a monthly term, the only one you can host yourself, and the only one that splits remote support and unattended access into two separately priced products. TeamViewer publishes no prices at all. AnyDesk and Splashtop both bill a year at a time. On rate alone Splashtop is the cheapest of the four, and ScreenConnect is the most flexible about how you buy.
Can I just buy ScreenConnect online?
Yes, and it is straightforward. Both price lists have an order path and you can be running the same day. Self hosting is the exception and needs a conversation with their sales team. If what you want is a licence rather than a service, buying direct from them is the sensible move and we would tell you so.
What does ScreenConnect actually cost?
Remote Support is twenty eight dollars a month for One, forty three for Standard and fifty three for Premium, each quoted per concurrent technician licence on an annual term. Unattended Access is a separate product priced by agent volume, from thirty one dollars a month for twenty five agents up to twelve hundred and ninety one for two and a half thousand, and that line does publish a monthly option at roughly a quarter more. There is also a free single user licence, and self hosting is arranged through their sales team.
What does one ScreenConnect licence actually cover?
On the concurrent line, Remote Support One caps the account at a single technician licence and allows one live session with ten standing agents. Standard lifts the licence cap and reaches three simultaneous sessions with unlimited agents per licence. Premium reaches ten sessions. On all three, one licence still means one technician inside it at a time. The agent based product works the other way around, with unlimited simultaneous technicians and a purchased volume of machines.
What is not on the published price lists?
Their comparison grid lists the feature rows but does not render which tier each one lands on, so we are not going to tell you where single sign on or phone support sits. What we can say is that self hosting is arranged through sales rather than bought online. The bigger omission is the sizing. How many parallel sessions your shift pattern needs and how many machines truly deserve a standing agent are the two numbers that decide your bill, and neither page can produce them for you.
ScreenConnect works out cheaper than three hundred a month. Why would I pay you?
Then take it. At a modest agent count ScreenConnect is a fraction of three hundred a month and we are not going to argue with a rate card. You should not pay us for the software. You pay us because somebody has to choose between the concurrent line and the agent line, size both, decide which machines get a standing agent, provision and remove technicians, and still be doing all of it a year from now. If you already have that person, buy the licence.
At what point does ScreenConnect stop being the cheaper answer?
Somewhere between two hundred and fifty and five hundred standing agents, if you are buying both lines. Standard at forty three plus two hundred and fifty agents at two hundred and six is two hundred and forty nine a month, just under us. Swap that band for five hundred agents and it is four hundred and thirty, comfortably over. That is the tightest crossover on this hub, and it still means ScreenConnect stays cheaper for most small teams, which we are not going to pretend otherwise about.
Is ScreenConnect metered on people, sessions or machines?
On all three at once, which is exactly what makes it awkward to compare with anything. The concurrent line meters live sessions and holds technicians inside a licence to one at a time. The agent line meters installed machines and lets technicians run unlimited. So the useful question is not what it costs per user, it is which of those two meters your support pattern actually runs on.
Is ScreenConnect a better client than Zoho Assist?
It has a long reputation among managed service providers and plenty of people who will defend it, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. If you need to host remote access inside your own network, ScreenConnect is the answer here and we are not, because Zoho Assist is cloud only. For ordinary attended and unattended support Assist connects perfectly well. Where ScreenConnect wins on the product itself, we will say so on the call.
Does Zoho Assist connect to the rest of Zoho?
That is the reason to choose it. Assist sits alongside Desk, CRM, Projects and People, so a call becomes a ticket, a session, a note on the customer record and a line on a report with nothing wired in between. ScreenConnect integrates with a long list of tools, which is genuinely useful, and an integration between two products is still not one record moving through one suite.
What exactly do you do for three hundred a month?
We pick the licensing model, provision technicians and remove them when they leave, deploy standing agents on the machines that need them and retire the ones that do not, build the access groups and the session permissions, enforce your access policy, connect Assist to Zoho Desk and CRM so sessions land on tickets, produce the session reporting, and carry the Zoho Assist licence on our invoice. Technician support is unlimited and included.
Who holds the Zoho Assist licence, you or us?
We do, and this is the exception across our Zoho work. Everywhere else you buy the licence direct from Zoho and we manage it. On Assist we carry the subscription ourselves and it is billed inside the three hundred, on one invoice. Your session data and your configuration remain yours. Because the subscription sits in our name rather than yours, leaving means moving it, so ask us how that unwinds before you sign.
Can you move us off ScreenConnect?
Yes, and the migration is mostly an audit. The technician licences you are actually paying for, the machines carrying a standing agent, the agent band you are sitting inside and the access nobody ever revoked all get listed before anything moves, and we build the equivalent in Zoho Assist before you switch. The thing to plan around is your term, so tell us which of the two products renews first and we will work backwards from it.
Is there a minimum term?
No. Three hundred a month, month to month, thirty days notice. ScreenConnect will sell you a monthly term on the agent line, which is fairer than the rest of this hub manages, while its package prices are still listed annually. The comparison is not only what you pay, it is how long you are committed to a decision that may turn out to be the wrong one.
What if we only ever need one session at a time?
Then buy Remote Support One, or start on the free single user licence, and keep your three hundred dollars. One live session, one person who knows every machine they support, and a list nobody else needs to read is not a problem worth paying anyone to manage. Come back when the second technician starts, or when the first one leaves and nobody is sure what they could still reach.
What happens if we outgrow Zoho?
Some businesses do. Once support becomes one small part of manufacturing, field service or project delivery, the honest answer is ERPNext rather than another Zoho app, and we run that too.
​Contact

Ask Us Anything

We’d love to hear from you!