On Page Navigation

A Bitwarden Alternative for Companies Who Will Never Self Host It

Bitwarden Teams is four dollars a user a month, Enterprise is six, seats are unlimited on both, and self hosting costs nothing extra. Bitwarden also says plainly that running your own server takes time and skill. We are what you buy when nobody in the building has either, and what we run is Zoho Vault, at three hundred a month for the whole organisation.
What Bitwarden gives you, and what it still expects you to do
The cheapest licence on this hub, and the one that quietly assumes an administrator
Bitwarden publishes everything. Both business prices, the whole feature split, the compliance list and the source code itself. There is nothing hidden here and nothing to negotiate. What the price does not include is a person, and Bitwarden is unusually honest about that in its own documentation.
Icon representing a self hosted server that somebody has to patch

Self hosting is free, and it is also a server you now own

Bitwarden charges nothing extra to run it on your own hardware. Their own answer on the subject adds that it requires technical resources and expertise for server maintenance, security and updates. That sentence is roughly the whole of our business.
Icon representing policy and single sign on starting on the enterprise plan

The control layer starts on the Enterprise plan

Teams at four dollars gives you SCIM, Directory Connector, groups, event logs and the API. Passwordless SSO, organisation policies, custom roles, account recovery and Access Intelligence all begin at Enterprise, six dollars a user a month billed annually.
Icon representing a dedicated manager limited to qualified customers

A named contact is for qualified customers only

Priority email support runs around the clock on both business plans, which is more than most. The dedicated engagement manager and the dedicated onboarding are Enterprise features, and Bitwarden marks both as being for qualified customers rather than for everyone who pays.
Cheap, open, and still unattended
Bitwarden is the best value licence on this hub, and that is not what this page disagrees with
Bitwarden is open source, audited in public, certified against ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3, and it costs less per person than anything else compared here. If you are picking a password manager on merit and price, it is a defensible answer and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What we sell is the part that stays undone after the licence is bought.

Cascadia

Somebody owns the collection list, and keeps owning it long after the migration week ends.

Without Cascadia

A licence at four dollars a head, a server nobody has patched since spring, and a leaver whose shared logins were never rotated.

Comparison

Cascadia vs Bitwarden
Bitwarden sells you the vault, the console and the option to host it yourself, and it does all three well. This table does not measure the product. It measures who does the configuring, the reviewing and the offboarding afterwards, and everything in the Cascadia column is part of Managed Zoho Vault at one flat monthly figure.

The collection structure is designed for your team before anybody starts filling it

Who may create a collection, and who may only read one, decided by somebody who knows your org chart

A standing review of who still holds what, with a named person accountable for acting on the result

One figure for the organisation, so hiring five people does not change the bill

The person who designed your access model is still the person you reach next quarter

A leaver handled as a run book, with every shared credential they touched actually rotated

Emergency access and account recovery settled on purpose, before the day you need them

The credential lives in the same estate as the client record it belongs to

A straight no on the first call when somebody already runs this well for you

Policy and two step enforcement configured for you, and read again six months later

Generic logo representing a comparable provider.
Bitwarden

Where Bitwarden fits

If you have an administrator who will genuinely run it, Bitwarden is the best value on this hub and quite possibly the right answer full stop.
Cascadia Web Services logo

Cascadia Web Services

Where the licence ends and the running of it starts

We exist for the company that bought a good password manager and then discovered that nobody had been given the job of running it.

Where Bitwarden is strong

Icon representing the lowest published per user price on this hub
It is the cheapest credible option here, by a distance
Teams is four dollars per user per month billed annually and Enterprise is six, both carrying unlimited users, with a free tier underneath them. Nothing else compared on this hub starts anywhere near that low.
Icon representing public source code and independent third party audits
Open source, and audited by people who do not work there
The code is public, and Bitwarden points at third party audits, a bug bounty and its own security whitepaper. It holds ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3, and states compliance with GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA and the Data Privacy Framework.
Icon representing self hosting included at no additional charge
Self hosting is included rather than sold as an upgrade
Enterprise lets you run the server on your own network at no additional charge. For a business with a data residency rule and somebody to maintain it, that is a real advantage, and none of the other three products on this hub match it.
Icon representing a vendor programme built for managed service providers
They accept that somebody has to run it
Bitwarden runs an MSP programme with a Provider Portal for managing client organisations and billing, tiered discounts and a dedicated account manager. We are not going to claim there is no managed route to Bitwarden, because they built one.
None of that is padding. If your Bitwarden estate already has an administrator who patches the server, prunes the collections and runs the leaver process, this page has nothing to sell you. Every capability on that list still waits for somebody to decide what it should say and who it covers, and holding that decision is the job our Managed Zoho work exists to do.

What three hundred a month covers, and what it deliberately does not

Icon representing one organisation fee with nothing metered beside it
One organisation fee, and it does not move when you hire
Vault setup and user provisioning, migration off whatever you are on now, the collection structure, the sharing and recovery rules, joiner and leaver runs, policy and two step enforcement, and a review on a schedule. Three hundred a month, whether you are eleven people or ninety.
Icon representing the headcount at which two monthly figures meet
Their licence is cheaper than our fee until about seventy five people
Bitwarden Teams at four dollars a user reaches three hundred a month at seventy five people, and Enterprise at six reaches it at fifty. Below those counts their licence costs less than our management fee, and our fee sits on top of a Zoho Vault licence you buy in your own name rather than replacing one. The arithmetic favours Bitwarden and we are not going to dress that up.
Icon representing the same named person answering the phone months later
The decision and the person who made it stay together
The same named person who decided which collections exist and who may open them is the one you reach in March when a contractor needs access for six weeks. Not a queue, and not a stranger reading your setup for the first time.
Icon representing a credential stored beside the record it belongs to
The credential lands where the record already lives
Zoho Vault sits in the same estate as CRM, Desk and Projects, on one directory, one admin console and one bill. Bitwarden is deliberately standalone, which is a strength on its own terms and a second system to administer on ours.
Bitwarden may well be enough, and more often on this hub than the others. For a team with somebody who genuinely enjoys running infrastructure, buy Enterprise, host it yourself and spend the three hundred elsewhere. We are for the company where that person does not exist and everybody has quietly agreed not to mention it.

Onboarding process

The first sixty days, and where nearly all of the work actually sits

Almost all of this is our time rather than yours. Bitwarden, like every other product on this hub, hands you an empty vault and a page of switches. What follows is the part that decides whether any of them ever get set correctly.

1

Nothing changes until we have watched how the team really shares things today

We start with the spreadsheet, the pinned message and the shared login that three people use. Not the policy you meant to have, the one you actually have. Nothing gets migrated in this fortnight.

2

Every collection, every standing permission and every account nobody has closed gets counted

The collections in daily use, the ones opened for a project that finished in April, the contractor who still holds a key, and the two service accounts whose password has not changed since the person who created them left.

3

The structure, the sharing rules and the recovery position get written down and agreed

Which collections exist, who may create one, what a contractor gets and for how long, who can trigger account recovery, and what happens in the hour after somebody resigns. Written down, agreed by you, then built.

4

You run a real month on it, with one genuine joiner and one genuine leaver

The first month runs with us beside it. Whatever turns out to be awkward gets changed while we are still in the room, rather than filed for a review that never happens.

Testimonials

Don't Take Our Word For It

Two situations where the password manager was fine and the running of it was not
Neither is a client story and neither names anybody. They are shapes that turn up often enough to be worth describing. Where a business has grown past what a Zoho estate can carry, the honest answer is managed ERPNext, and raising that early costs us less than selling you a system you will need to leave.
A technician at a terminal beside a rack of network equipment

How this plays out

A self hosted instance that nobody had patched in fourteen months

They chose Bitwarden Enterprise for exactly the right reason, put it on their own server, and the person who built it changed jobs. Updates stopped. The vault carried on working, which is the problem, because nothing failed loudly enough for anybody to notice.
A man at a laptop working out how long something has been going wrong

When this comes up

A free tier that quietly became the company password manager

One person started on the free plan for their own logins, then shared a client credential from it because it was quicker than asking. Within a year eleven people were treating a personal vault as the company one, with no event log, no policy and no administrator who could see any of it.
300

Dollars a month for the entire organisation, and the figure holds while you grow

The audit, the structure, the migration, the joiner and leaver runs and the standing review, at one number that does not move with headcount.
0

Dollars charged per seat, per collection or per credential stored

The count of your vaults, the structure design, the access model, the migration and the reviews all sit inside the one figure. Nothing on that list is metered.
4-8

Weeks, typically, before the team stops working around the vault instead of through it

Four to eight weeks in most cases, and longer where credentials are spread across personal accounts that nobody has ever inventoried.

Bitwarden alternative and managed Zoho Vault FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Bitwarden compare to the other password managers on this hub?
Bitwarden publishes the lowest business pricing of the four compared here and is the only one that is open source and free to self host. 1Password publishes its prices too and is the more polished product. LastPass and Dashlane both render their business pricing client side, so we do not quote a figure for either. All four are measured on this hub against the same question, which is whether anybody is running the vault after it has been bought.
Is the Bitwarden admin console on both business plans?
Both business plans give you administration. Teams includes the public API, event and audit logs retained indefinitely, user groups, Directory Connector, SCIM provisioning and organisation two step login through Duo. Enterprise adds the parts most people mean when they say control: passwordless SSO, organisation policies, custom roles, the account recovery workflow and Access Intelligence.
What does Bitwarden actually cost?
Teams is four dollars per user per month billed annually. Enterprise is six. Both carry unlimited users, and there is a free tier below them. Secrets Manager is a separate subscription at six dollars per user on Teams and twelve on Enterprise. The figures are published in plain sight, which is more than several vendors on this hub manage.
Which Bitwarden capabilities sit on the higher plan?
Passwordless SSO integration, organisation policies, Access Intelligence, custom roles, the account recovery workflow, a free Families plan for every user, and the option to self host. The dedicated engagement manager and the dedicated onboarding are Enterprise as well, and Bitwarden marks both as being for qualified customers.
What is not on the published plan list?
Who decides what a collection is for and who may create one. Who removes the contractor when the project ends. Who reads the event log. Who patches the server if you choose to self host. Bitwarden hands you every switch and no opinion about which way to set it.
We already pay for Bitwarden. Why would I pay you three hundred a month on top?
Often you should not, and we say so on the first call more than you would expect. If somebody in your business already owns the collection list, runs the leaver process and keeps the server current, you have what we sell and you are paying a great deal less for it. Call us when that person leaves, or when it turns out they were never really doing it.
At what point does Bitwarden stop being the cheaper answer?
On licence cost alone, it does not. Teams at four dollars a user reaches three hundred a month at seventy five people and Enterprise at six reaches it at fifty, and our fee sits on top of a Zoho Vault licence rather than replacing one. The arithmetic favours Bitwarden at almost any size. What changes the answer is the cost of the work nobody is doing, and that one never appears on either invoice.
Is Bitwarden metered on people or on passwords?
On people. Both business plans are a straight per user monthly charge, with unlimited passwords, unlimited devices and unlimited collections. Encrypted file attachment storage is five gigabytes personal and five for organisation items, and it can be expanded.
Is Bitwarden a better product than Zoho Vault?
Taken on its own, as a password manager and nothing else, we would generally say yes. It is open source, audited in public, cheaper, and it self hosts. Zoho Vault gets chosen for a different reason, which is that it sits inside an estate you are already running. If Zoho is not that estate for you, this comparison probably ends here and Bitwarden is the sensible pick.
Does Zoho Vault connect to the rest of Zoho?
That is the reason to choose it. Vault sits alongside CRM, Desk, Projects and the rest on one directory, one admin console and one bill. A credential ends up beside the client record it belongs to, instead of in a second system with its own user list to maintain.
What exactly do you do for three hundred a month?
We set up the vault and provision your users, migrate you off whatever you are on now, design the collection structure and the sharing rules, configure policy and two step enforcement, run joiners and leavers, review standing access on a schedule, and stay reachable about any of it. One figure for the organisation, month to month.
Who holds the Zoho Vault licence, you or us?
You do, and that is deliberate. The Vault subscription is bought in your name and stays in your name, so if you ever stop working with us you keep the vault, the data and the account. Our three hundred is a management fee and nothing else.
Can you move us off Bitwarden?
Yes. Bitwarden supports encrypted export, so the data itself moves cleanly and that is not the hard part. The time goes into deciding what the structure should be on the other side, rather than copying across a collection list that grew by accident over four years. If you are self hosted we will also want a conversation about what happens to the server.
Is there a minimum term?
No. Three hundred a month, month to month, thirty days notice. There is no setup fee, no annual prepayment, and no tier above this one that unlocks the parts that matter.
What if we are only five people?
Then buy Bitwarden Teams at four dollars a head, or start on the free tier, and do not pay us anything at all. At five people the collection list is short enough to hold in your head. Come back when it is not.
What happens if we outgrow Zoho?
Some businesses do. Once what you are running is manufacturing, stock across several locations or a chart of accounts a spreadsheet cannot hold, the estate stops being the right shape and we will say so. That conversation is about ERPNext, and it is not about the vault.
​Contact

Ask Us Anything

We’d love to hear from you!