On Page Navigation

A Microsoft Teams Alternative for Companies That Never Actually Chose It

Microsoft Teams does not arrive as a decision. It arrives switched on inside a Microsoft 365 subscription you already pay for, which makes it the cheapest chat on this hub and the least governed. Zoho Cliq is one app inside a suite, and we manage it for three hundred dollars a month per organisation while your licence stays in your name.
What Microsoft Teams costs, and why the number looks like zero
A dollar sixty a person, if you read Microsoft's two price lists against each other
Microsoft publishes the numbers and almost nobody looks. Teams Essentials on its own is four dollars a person a month paid yearly. Microsoft 365 Business Basic is seven, and the same plan sold without Teams is five dollars forty, which prices the chat at a dollar sixty. Business Standard with Copilot is twenty three fifty, and twenty thirty without. If you already hold Microsoft 365 then the chat is bought, and the arithmetic that dominates every other page on this hub is over before it starts.
Icon representing chat software that arrived switched on without anybody choosing it

Nobody signed off on Teams, so nobody owns it

It was switched on with the rest of the subscription. There was no evaluation, no rollout and no named owner, because there was no purchase to approve. Software that arrives without a decision behind it tends to keep running without one.
Icon representing one team creating a group, a site and a mailbox at the same moment

Every team creates a group, a SharePoint site and a mailbox behind it

Microsoft documents this plainly. Creating a team creates a Microsoft 365 group and its related services at the same moment, including a SharePoint team site, a shared mailbox, Planner and OneNote. Users may create and manage groups by default. Two hundred teams is two hundred sites and two hundred mailboxes that nobody ever put on a list.
Icon representing a removed account that keeps access for a couple of hours

Removing somebody takes longer than the admin screen suggests

Microsoft's own guidance says a person removed from a group outside Teams keeps chat access for roughly two hours, and that membership changes made in the admin centre or in Entra ID can take up to twenty four hours to reach Teams. It is documented and it is manageable. It is also the sort of detail that only matters on the day it matters.
A price of nothing, and the question it hides
The cheapest chat on this hub is the one nobody has ever audited
Teams will cost you less than we do, and for a Microsoft shop it costs nothing extra at all. That is a real answer and we are not going to talk you out of it. What being already paid for does not settle is how many teams exist, who may create one, which outside companies hold guest access, what is sitting in the SharePoint site behind each team, where the history lives when somebody resigns, and how a conversation ever reaches a ticket or a customer record.

Cascadia

The structure designed rather than accumulated, guest and external access written down, joiners and leavers handled the week they happen, retention settled before anybody needs it, and Cliq wired into Desk, CRM and Projects so a conversation lands on the record. Three hundred dollars a month per organisation, month to month, up to a hundred users and five bots or integrations. Your Zoho Cliq licence stays in your name.

Without Cascadia

Chat that came free with something else, a team list that grew on its own with a site and a mailbox behind each one, guests nobody has reviewed, and a retention position nobody has taken. Everything past the subscription you already pay for is still yours to plan and run.

Comparison

Cascadia vs Microsoft Teams
Microsoft will not lose this on price, because for most of its buyers Teams is already inside a subscription they hold. This table compares what each side is responsible for instead. Everything in the Cascadia column is included in Managed Zoho Cliq at one flat monthly figure.

Somebody designs the team and channel structure before every project spawns another site nobody has listed

Somebody writes down who may create a team, who may invite a guest from another company, and what may leave through a shared channel

A monthly pass over members, guests, external access and connected apps, checked against who joined, who left and what got connected

A price that stays put when you hire ten people, and that does not reprice when you pass three hundred users

The same named person on every call, who designed your structure and remembers why each rule is there

One messaging standard across the whole company, rather than chat in one place and the customer record in another

A single monthly figure per organisation, rather than a benefit folded into a subscription nobody reads

Message, ticket, deal and project sitting in one suite instead of stitched together with integrations

An honest no on the first call if the Microsoft licence you already hold really is the whole answer

A monthly read of who is in the workspace and who outside it can reach in, written for you rather than exported and assembled by whoever has the time

Generic logo representing a comparable provider.
Microsoft Teams

Where Microsoft Teams fits

If chat is the whole requirement, you already pay for Microsoft 365, and somebody keeps the team list honest, Teams is the cheaper answer by a distance and it costs you nothing extra to keep. It gets harder as the company grows, because every team brings a site and a mailbox with it and nobody owns the sprawl underneath.
Cascadia Web Services logo

Cascadia Web Services

Where a licence you already own stops being the interesting question

We exist for the business where sending the message is the easy part, and the hard part is that the conversation also has to reach a ticket, sit against a customer record, and still be findable two years later. Once nobody has the hours to build that and keep it built, whether the chat came free stops being the number that decides anything.

Where Microsoft Teams is strong

Icon representing chat already included in a subscription the business holds
If you hold Microsoft 365, the chat is already bought
Business Basic is seven dollars a person a month paid yearly, and the same plan sold without Teams is five dollars forty. By Microsoft's own arithmetic the chat costs a dollar sixty. Standalone Teams Essentials is four dollars. Nothing else on this hub competes with a line you are already paying, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
Icon representing large meetings and business telephony inside one platform
It is a meetings and telephony platform that happens to include chat
Three hundred participants, meetings that run up to thirty hours, recordings with transcripts and live captions, and a telephony line starting at ten dollars a person for Teams Phone Standard or seventeen with a US calling plan. Rooms management is forty. Slack and Cliq are chat products with meetings attached, and this is the other way round.
Icon representing documents living in the same place as the conversation about them
The files are already where the work is
Every team arrives with a SharePoint site, a shared mailbox, Planner and OneNote, created at the same moment. That is the governance problem further up this page, and it is also a genuine advantage, because the document nobody can find in a chat tool is sitting in the site attached to the team that discussed it.
Icon representing software everybody in the business already has open
It is the default, so nobody has to be persuaded
In a Microsoft shop, Teams is what the finance team, the auditor and the client at the other end already have open. Zoho Cliq sits inside its own suite, which is an advantage if you live in Zoho and a limitation if you do not.
All of that is real, and if chat is the requirement and somebody keeps the team list honest, Teams is a cheaper answer than anything we sell. What it is not is a standing answer to where the conversation goes afterwards. That is a different job, and it is the one our Managed Zoho work is built around.

What three hundred a month buys when the licence was never the expensive part

Icon representing one flat organisation fee that does not move as headcount grows
One figure per organisation, whoever you hire next
The structure, the permissions, the guest and external access rules, the joiner and leaver process, the Desk and CRM wiring, and up to five bots or integrations. Built once and then kept right, up to a hundred users, with no change request and no hourly rate waiting behind it. The Zoho Cliq licence stays yours and is not inside this figure.
Icon representing a price with no per person meter behind it
Nothing here is metered on people
Three hundred a month covers the tenth hire and the hundredth. Microsoft 365 Business plans stop at three hundred users, and passing that line moves you onto a different set of products at a different price. Our figure does not know how many people you have.
Icon representing the person who designed the setup also answering the phone
The person who designed it is the person who answers the phone
You are not explaining your structure to somebody meeting it for the first time. Microsoft support is capable and their documentation is genuinely excellent, and we used it to write this page. Neither of those decided which of your teams should be private, or why a guest from a project two years ago still has access.
Icon representing a message sitting beside the ticket and the customer record
One suite, so the message is already next to the ticket
Cliq sits beside Desk, CRM, Projects and People, so a conversation reaches the ticket and the customer record with nothing in between. Teams reaches SharePoint and Outlook the same way, which is the same argument made by a larger vendor. The question is which suite your business actually runs in.
Teams will cost you less than we do at almost any headcount, because for most companies it is already paid for. The line is whether anybody owns what happens inside it. Once the team list outgrows the people who remember why it exists, and guests hold access nobody has reviewed, the licence stops being the hard part and running it becomes the hard part.

Onboarding process

What the first sixty days look like when the team sprawl stops being your problem

Most of the work is ours. Anything on this hub will carry a message from one person to another. The difference is who decides which teams exist, who may reach in from outside, and who comes back to both when the business changes shape.

1

Nothing moves until we have read how your people actually talk

We sit with the people who live in chat all day and with the ones who quietly avoid it. What comes out of that is a record of where decisions really get made, which is rarely where the org chart puts them.

2

We count the teams, the guests and the outside companies before anything moves

The teams somebody posts in weekly, the ones opened for a project that finished two years ago, and the guest accounts from clients and contractors nobody has reviewed since. Behind each of those sits a site and a mailbox. That list decides the structure, and it is almost never the list people expect.

3

The structure and the permissions get built around your business rather than left on defaults

By default any user can create a team, and creating one creates a group, a site and a mailbox behind it. That is fine right up until it is not. We set the naming, the private and public split, the guest rules and the external access around the way your business actually runs.

4

You run a full month on it, including one real project and one real departure

The first month of live messaging runs with us alongside it. Anything that lands in the wrong place, reaches somebody outside who should not have seen it, or leaves access standing after a resignation gets fixed while it is still fresh.

Testimonials

Don't Take Our Word For It

Two situations where a licence you already own stops being the question
Scenarios, not client stories. A business that outgrows what a Zoho estate can carry belongs on managed ERPNext, and we would rather say that early than sell you something you have to leave.
Hands checking figures on a calculator against a stack of invoices

How this plays out

A company with two hundred teams and no list of them

Nobody had created two hundred teams on purpose. Each project opened one, and each one quietly brought a site, a mailbox and a set of permissions with it. The chat bill was zero because the licence was already bought. The clean up was three weeks of somebody's life, and the question at the end of it was who owns this now.
A stack of paperwork with no order anybody could follow

When this comes up

A company holding Cliq inside a Zoho subscription and paying for Microsoft 365 as well

Finance knew the Zoho subscription included a messaging app. Everybody else was in Teams because Teams was already open. Neither side was wrong, and the two renewals never landed on the same page as each other, so the duplication went unnoticed for two years. Consolidating turned out to be a governance exercise rather than a technical one.
300

Dollars a month per organisation, printed here, with your Cliq licence staying yours

Everything from the first read of how your people talk through to the monthly access reporting sits inside that number. Unlike our Zoho Assist work, the Cliq subscription stays in your name and is not part of this fee.
0

Dollars per person, per guest or per team

The review, the structure design, the permissions, the migration and the reporting all sit inside the three hundred, up to a hundred users and five integrations. Nothing is metered and there is no seat count to grow into.
4-8

Weeks, usually, before your people are on the new setup without us in it

Four to eight weeks typically, and longer where teams have accumulated for years without anybody keeping a list of which ones still matter.

Microsoft Teams alternative and managed Zoho Cliq FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Microsoft Teams compare to Slack, Google Chat and Mattermost?
It is the only one of the four that most buyers never actually buy, because it arrives inside a Microsoft 365 subscription they already hold. Slack sells chat on its own with a published per person price. Google Chat has no price of its own and exists only inside Workspace. Mattermost publishes nothing and quotes every tier. Teams is the only one here that both folds itself into a suite and sells the same suite without itself.
Can I just buy Microsoft Teams online?
Yes. Teams Essentials is four dollars a person a month paid yearly and you can buy it directly. Most companies never do, because they already hold a Microsoft 365 plan with Teams inside it. If what you want is a chat tool rather than a managed service, buying direct is the sensible move and we would tell you so.
What does Microsoft Teams actually cost?
On its own, Teams Essentials is four dollars a person a month paid yearly. Inside a suite it is harder to see. Microsoft 365 Business Basic is seven and the same plan sold without Teams is five dollars forty, so the chat is a dollar sixty. Business Standard with Copilot is twenty three fifty and twenty thirty without, so there it is three dollars twenty. Every one of those figures is the annual rate.
What does one Teams licence actually cover?
Chat, calls and video for one person, plus whatever else the plan carries. Essentials adds ten gigabytes of storage per user, meetings running up to thirty hours and up to three hundred participants. It does not include the Office apps or a business email domain, which is what Business Basic at seven dollars adds.
What is not on the published price list?
The governance. How many teams you should have, who may create one, which outside companies may reach in as guests, what is sitting in the SharePoint site behind each team, how long messages need to be kept, and what happens to a departing person's history. None of that appears on a pricing page, and none of it is answered by holding the licence.
Teams is already paid for. Why would I pay you three hundred a month?
You should not pay us for the software, and if Teams sits inside your subscription then the software is already free to you. You pay us because somebody has to design the structure, decide who may create a team and invite a guest, provision people and remove them, wire chat into Desk and CRM, and still be doing all of it a year from now. If you already have that person, keep Teams.
At what point does Teams stop being the cheaper answer?
On the licence alone, almost never, and we are not going to invent a crossover we do not have. Standalone Teams Essentials at four dollars passes our three hundred at about seventy five people. As a suite increment at a dollar sixty it does not pass it until roughly a hundred and eighty seven, and Microsoft 365 Business caps at three hundred users anyway. The case for us is the work, not the licence.
Is Teams metered on people, messages or storage?
People, like almost everything else here. Storage moves with the plan, at ten gigabytes per user on Essentials and a terabyte on the Business plans. Those Business plans also stop at three hundred users, so growth eventually moves you onto a different set of products rather than simply adding seats to this one.
Is Microsoft Teams a better product than Zoho Cliq?
For meetings and telephony, comfortably, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. Three hundred participants, meetings running up to thirty hours, transcripts, live captions and a real phone system behind it are more than Cliq offers. Cliq wins on one thing, which is that it already sits next to Desk, CRM, Projects and People. If meetings are the requirement, Teams is the better buy.
Does Zoho Cliq connect to the rest of Zoho?
That is the reason to choose it. Cliq sits alongside Desk, CRM, Projects and People, so a conversation becomes a ticket, a note on the customer record and a line on a report with nothing wired in between. Teams does the same thing into SharePoint and Outlook, which is the identical argument made by a larger vendor. The honest question is which suite your business actually runs on.
What exactly do you do for three hundred a month?
We design the team and channel structure and the naming, set the private and public split, write the guest and external access rules, provision people and remove them when they leave, configure up to five bots or integrations, connect Cliq to Zoho Desk, CRM and Projects, run the migration off whatever you are on now, and produce the monthly access reporting. Support for your team is unlimited and included. The figure covers up to a hundred users in one organisation.
Who holds the Zoho Cliq licence, you or us?
You do. You buy Cliq direct from Zoho and we manage it, which is how all of our Zoho work runs with one exception. Managed Zoho Assist is that exception, because there we carry the subscription ourselves. On Cliq the licence, the data and the account all stay in your name, so leaving means we hand back the keys rather than move a subscription.
Can you move us off Microsoft Teams?
Yes, and the migration is mostly an audit. The teams people actually use, the ones nobody has posted in for a year, the guests still holding access, the site and mailbox sitting behind each team, and the history you are obliged to keep all get listed before anything moves. The files usually matter more than the messages, and that is the part most migrations underestimate.
Is there a minimum term?
No. Three hundred a month, month to month, thirty days notice. Every Microsoft price on display is an annual subscription that renews automatically. The comparison is not only what you pay, it is how long you are committed to a decision that may turn out to be the wrong one.
What if we are only five people?
Then use whatever you already hold and keep your three hundred dollars. Five people who all sit in one room do not have a governance problem, and that includes here. Come back when the second team starts, or when the first person leaves and nobody is sure which teams and sites they could still reach.
What happens if we outgrow Zoho?
Some do. Once the work being discussed is manufacturing, field service or project delivery at scale, the honest answer is ERPNext rather than another Zoho app, and we run that too.
​Contact

Ask Us Anything

We’d love to hear from you!