On Page Navigation

A Gmelius Alternative for Teams Whose Inbox Is Tied to Google

Gmelius counts users, then it counts conversations, and its cheapest plan has no shared inbox on it at all. Ours is one figure, 500 a month for the organization, and it counts neither of those things.
Where the money goes, and which of the four plans can actually share an inbox
Four tiers, priced per Google account per month. What changes between them is how much the software is allowed to do before it stops.
Gmelius publishes every rate it charges and a full feature grid in the open, so nothing below was estimated. The figures quoted are the annual ones. Paying month to month costs more on every tier, and on the middle plan it is a third more.
Icon representing an entry plan with no shared inbox on it at all

The cheapest plan cannot share an inbox at all

Meli is nineteen dollars a user and is an assistant for one person's own mailbox. Shared inboxes, shared labels, assignment and automation rules all begin on Growth at twenty five. A team shopping for a shared inbox has no business on the entry tier, and tends to discover that after signing up.
Icon representing a monthly ceiling on conversations and on rule runs

Nineteen, then twenty five, then forty, then a quotation

Growth at twenty five carries shared inboxes and ten thousand rule executions a month. Pro at forty raises that to a hundred thousand and is where CRM connections, webhooks, custom permissions and backups live. Enterprise is quoted rather than listed, and it will not be quoted to you below fifty users.
Icon representing a subscription that only works on top of Google Workspace

Conversations are metered, and the meter is not the seat

Meli allows five thousand email conversations a month, Growth ten thousand and Pro a hundred thousand. Rule executions are capped the same way and Meli has no rules at all. A busy month can move you up a tier without a single person joining, which is a different problem from headcount and it arrives faster.
Built for a team that is never leaving Gmail
This is not an argument that Gmelius is overpriced
For a Google shop of five people Gmelius costs a quarter of what we do, and the model behind that is coherent. You pay per Google account, and what you get back is the mailbox that account already has, made considerably better. What a buyer should notice is that the bill has two dials on it rather than one, and a good quarter turns both of them.

Cascadia

One monthly figure, on a shared inbox that does not care which mail provider the company happens to stand on.

Without Cascadia

A capable layer on Gmail, priced per Google account and metered by how much traffic it carries.

Comparison

Cascadia vs Gmelius
Gmelius does something genuinely clever, which is to leave Gmail alone and improve it in place. The comparison starts where that choice stops paying: what happens in a month with more traffic than usual, what happens to a department that is not on Google, and what becomes of a thread when the account holding it is closed. Everything in the Cascadia column below comes with managed Zoho TeamInbox at one monthly figure, and none of it is reserved for a tier above.

A shared inbox built around who owns which queue, on whatever mail platform the business actually stands on

A monthly price that does not move in the month your volume doubles

A message that arrives with the customer file already open beside it, instead of a name you go and look up elsewhere

Every channel the business answers on kept in one queue, with no plan deciding how many messages that queue may hold

When a rule quietly stops firing, you call the person who wrote it rather than a support queue

Routing and escalation drawn against the real rota, then left running through a bad month before anyone calls it finished

A decision on record covering who may open a complaint, how long it is kept, and how all of it comes back out again

A leaver's queue handed over whole, with the thread, the history and the promise still attached to one another

A straight answer in the first conversation about whether your traffic is heavy enough to justify any of this

One party accountable for the inbox and for the record behind it, so neither can be pointed at when something is missed

Generic logo representing a comparable provider.
Gmelius

Where Gmelius fits

You are on Google Workspace, you have a handful of people, and the last thing you want is a migration. Gmelius puts a shared inbox inside the Gmail everybody already opens, and five people on the annual Growth rate is a hundred and twenty five a month against our five hundred. For that business it is the right call and we would make it too.
Cascadia Web Services logo

Cascadia Web Services

Where the mailbox outgrows the layer on top of it

We are for the company whose volume has stopped being predictable, whose mail is not all inside one Google tenancy, or that has started needing the inbox and the customer record to be a single thing.

Where Gmelius is strong

Icon representing a shared inbox that never asks anyone to leave Gmail
Nobody has to be taught a new inbox
The shared inbox appears inside Gmail as labels and views, so the interface your team already knows is the interface they keep. Adoption costs close to nothing, and that is a real advantage which no amount of feature depth elsewhere makes up for.
Icon representing an assistant tier priced for one person working alone
Nineteen dollars buys a real assistant for one person
Meli drafts replies, sorts and classifies mail, schedules meetings and chases follow ups, for nineteen dollars a month. For a solo operator with nobody to share anything with, that is a sharply priced product and it is not remotely what we sell.
Icon representing published discount tiers for non profit organizations
The discounts are published rather than negotiated
Non profits take thirty percent off between five and nineteen users and fifty percent at twenty or more, printed on the pricing page with the thresholds spelled out. Most vendors make you ask for that, then make you ask again.
Icon representing usage ceilings written down as numbers rather than fair use
The ceilings are numbers, not a fair use paragraph
Five thousand, ten thousand and a hundred thousand conversations a month, each set down beside the plan it belongs to. Twenty custom labels here, a hundred there. You can work out which tier you belong on before you buy, provided you know your own volume, which most teams do not.
None of those four were a stretch to write. If you are five people on Google, your traffic is steady, and nothing outside the mailbox needs to know a conversation happened, then stay where you are and we would say so on the phone. The rest of this page starts mattering when one of those three stops holding.

What five hundred a month buys that a per user plan cannot

Icon representing a monthly price that never counts your people
A price that counts neither people nor messages
Five people or fifty, a quiet August or a brutal December, the figure is the same. No manager should be weighing whether a part time colleague is worth a licence, and nobody should be watching a conversation counter to see whether this month will cost more than last.
Icon representing the inbox and the customer record as one thing
The inbox reads the customer record rather than sitting beside it
TeamInbox, CRM and Desk share one tenancy, so a thread and the contact behind it are the same record approached from two sides. There is no integration to keep alive, no sync to fall behind, and no morning spent working out which system is telling the truth about a customer.
Icon representing a named person who is still there after the rollout
A named person who is still there in month nine
Gmelius has documentation and a support team and both are perfectly good. What documentation cannot do is remember why your escalation rule waits until four in the afternoon, or that it was written that way deliberately after a bad week in March.
Icon representing room for deals, tickets and reporting behind the inbox
Room to become an operation rather than a cleverer mailbox
Quotes, tickets, invoices, the job a message belongs to, a report putting response time next to revenue. Not one of those is an inbox feature, and every one of them turns up eventually.
There is a real chance Gmelius is the right answer, and if so you will hear it in the first conversation rather than after a proposal has been written. Start by counting the people who must reply, then find out how many conversations a month actually pass through. What we do sits underneath the inbox: shaping how work is routed, tying a message to the customer record behind it, and being able to say afterwards what a reply actually cost, and all of that happens inside the wider Zoho estate.

Onboarding process

The first sixty days, including the fortnight when the rules argue back

Any platform on this hub will put a message in front of somebody able to answer it. What separates them sits further back, in whether anyone can say a month later what was promised and who promised it.

1

We find out what your inbox actually handles

Two numbers matter before anything else: how many people genuinely must reply, and how many conversations a month arrive. Almost nobody has either to hand. On a metered platform those two figures are your bill, and on ours neither of them is.

2

The routing is drawn up before anything is switched on

Which addresses become shared queues, who owns each of them, and what becomes of a message still unclaimed an hour later. This is the expensive thing to get wrong, and it costs almost nothing to get right before anybody depends on it.

3

Who may see what, what escalates, and what is kept

Who is allowed to open a complaint. What becomes of a conversation after seven years. How long a message sits unanswered before it reaches somebody senior. Each of those is a decision, and leaving the default in place is a decision as well.

4

Live traffic runs through it with us still alongside

We stay on it through the first month in production. The angry thread, the reply to a message from three months ago, the person on leave whose queue nobody covered. Those weeks are the only honest test of whether any of the design was right.

Testimonials

Don't Take Our Word For It

Two situations where nobody was hired and the bill still moved
Neither of these is a client and neither has been dressed up as one. Both are shapes we meet constantly, written down plainly, and no real company's name is attached to either. A third shape sits past both and it does not care which inbox you chose. Once support, field work, invoicing and stock all need the same customer open at once, an inbox is no longer what you are short of. What you need is managed ERPNext.
A manager leading a team meeting, the point at which a busy month quietly turns into a higher subscription tier

How this plays out

The month the conversation ceiling arrived

A twelve person team runs support on Gmelius Growth at twenty five a user, which is three hundred a month. A product launch pushes them past ten thousand conversations inside one month. The only tier above Growth is Pro at forty, so the bill becomes four hundred and eighty. Nobody was hired and nothing was added.
A man at a window with a decision he cannot buy his way out of, because the software only runs where Google already is

When this comes up

One department was never on Google to begin with

A company acquires a smaller firm. The new office runs on Microsoft rather than Google, and Gmelius defines a user as a Google account. There is no plan to move to and no add on to buy. The shared inbox that works beautifully for two thirds of the business cannot be extended to the rest of it at any price.
500

Dollars a month, flat, whatever the volume does next

The volume review, the inbox and channel build, the routing, and one person answerable for all three. Hiring does not move it and neither does a heavy month.
0

Per user charges, conversation ceilings or a higher tier standing between you and a feature

Everything TeamInbox does is on from day one, because there is no tier above it we could sell you later. Nothing is withheld, so nothing needs justifying twice.
4-8

Weeks from first call to a queue that actually runs

Four to eight weeks covers most of them. It takes longer when years of correspondence are buried in one person's personal mailbox and have to be separated out before any of it can be shared, which happens more often than not.

Gmelius alternative and managed Zoho TeamInbox FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Gmelius compare to the other platforms on this hub?
It is the one that never asks anybody to leave Gmail, and it is priced per Google account. Every platform on this hub charges per user, so what separates them is the second meter. Gmelius meters conversations and rule executions. Front meters the channel type ahead of anything else, which is why its entry plan is cheap and narrow. Hiver also sits inside Gmail. Missive is the one built for a small team that wants chat and email in the same window.
Does Gmelius publish its pricing?
Three of its four rates plainly, alongside a full feature grid and every usage ceiling written as a number. Nineteen, twenty five and forty per user per month on annual billing, with the monthly equivalents printed beside them. Only Enterprise is quoted, and they say up front that it starts at fifty users.
What does the nineteen dollar plan actually stop you doing?
It stops you sharing anything at all. Meli works on a single person's own mailbox: no shared inboxes, no shared labels, and no automation rules whatsoever. Five users, five thousand conversations a month, five custom labels. It is a good personal tool and it is not a team product.
What sits outside the Gmelius user price?
Google Workspace, and it is the large one. Gmelius defines a user as a Gmail or Google Workspace account, so the subscription only means anything stacked on a mail bill you already pay. After that the ceilings are the cost: crossing ten thousand conversations or ten thousand rule executions in a month moves you to the next tier rather than adding an overage line.
What will neither subscription do for you?
Judgement. Neither subscription decides which queue a message belongs to, and neither will notice that a rule quietly holding complaints for six hours was written by accident. Both will carry out a bad routing decision faithfully, forever, without ever mentioning it.
We are already on Gmelius. Why would we pay you five hundred?
Below about a dozen users you probably should not, and we say that more often on this hub than anything else. Twelve people on Growth is three hundred a month and it works. What changes the arithmetic is the thirteenth user landing you on Pro, a month that crosses the conversation ceiling, or a part of the company that Google does not cover.
When does five hundred a month stop being the expensive option?
Later than on most pages here, and we would rather say so than dress it up. Growth at twenty five a user passes five hundred at the twenty first person. Pro at forty passes it at the thirteenth. Declining the annual rate brings both forward, Growth to the sixteenth and Pro to the eleventh. Below those numbers Gmelius is cheaper and there is no argument to be made about it.
Is there a size where Gmelius stops making sense?
Not really on headcount, since Pro carries unlimited users. It stops making sense at the edges of Google. A department on Microsoft, a shared address that is not a Google account, an acquisition arriving on another platform: none of those can be brought in, and no tier above you fixes it.
Is Gmelius a better shared inbox than Zoho TeamInbox?
Inside Gmail, yes, and it is not close, because there it is not really competing with TeamInbox at all. It is improving the mailbox your team already lives in. TeamInbox is a competent shared inbox that happens to sit in the same tenancy as your customers, your tickets and your invoices. Those are different products answering different questions.
How closely does Zoho TeamInbox sit to the rest of Zoho?
That is most of the reason to choose it. A thread turns into a Desk ticket, the contact opens in CRM alongside the message, Cliq carries the internal half of the discussion and Analytics reads across the lot. Nothing is exported anywhere and nothing waits for a nightly job.
What is actually included in the five hundred?
The shared inbox and team structure to begin with, then mail routing and domain setup, then the channels, then assignment rules, round robin, tagging, saved views, reply templates and collision detection. From there it is monthly response time reporting and one named person who keeps it running and never needs briefing twice.
Whose name is the Zoho TeamInbox licence in?
Yours, on purpose rather than by accident of billing. The tenancy is in your name and we work inside it. Our five hundred is a management fee and the Zoho subscription reaches you separately, which we would rather say out loud than fold quietly into a single figure. If we part company, the inboxes, the rules and the history stay exactly where they are.
Can you move us off Gmelius?
We can, and here is the warning before the offer rather than after it. The mail itself is not the difficulty, because it never left Google and it stays there. The difficulty is that Gmelius rules, shared labels and AI classifications are Gmail shaped, and turning them into TeamInbox queues is a redesign rather than a translation.
Does either side lock you into a term?
Neither of us asks for one. Gmelius quotes the annual rate first and charges more each month if you decline it, so the pull toward a year sits in the pricing rather than in a contract. Their own rule is that everybody on the team stays on the same plan, which in practice matters more than any term. Ours is monthly with nothing to sign.
We are five people on Google and busy. Which way does this go?
Gmelius, and it is not close. Five users on Growth is a hundred and twenty five a month against our five hundred, a quarter of the price, and it will do what you are asking of it. That answer costs us the work and it is still the right one. Come back when the user count is heading past twelve, or the first month your volume crosses the ceiling.
What if TeamInbox itself turns out to be too small?
That is a good result rather than a failure. Once a conversation is only one input into scheduling, invoicing and stock control, the mailbox is no longer where the difficulty lives. We move the operation onto ERPNext and the history travels with it.
​Contact

Ask Us Anything

We’d love to hear from you!