On Page Navigation

A Concur Alternative for Finance Teams Billed by the Report, Not the Head

Concur charges by the expense report. Users are unlimited, and then a fee lands every time somebody files. That is a real pricing model with real advantages, and if most of your staff never submit anything it will beat us outright. Managed Zoho Expense is five hundred dollars a month, flat, however many reports come in.
What Concur costs, and why the unit matters more than the rate
Around seven dollars a report on Base, around eleven on Plus, and no way to buy either without a sales call
Concur lists three tiers and prices the first two by the expense report rather than by the person. Base runs to roughly seven dollars a report and carries unlimited users. Plus is roughly eleven and adds ExpenseIt receipt capture and the User Support Desk. Premium is quoted, and it is where Concur Travel lives. Those two figures are starting estimates SAP publishes against its own calculator rather than a price list, and there is no self serve checkout anywhere on the site. You will be talking to a salesperson before you see a real number.
Icon representing a bill that moves with how many reports get filed

The meter is the expense report, not the employee

Users are unlimited on Base and on Plus. What you pay for is submissions. Give a hundred people access and the bill does not move; have twenty of them file every week and it does. That is unusual, it is honest, and it is genuinely the right shape for a company where most of the staff never claim anything.
Icon representing receipt capture and staff support held back to the middle tier

Receipt capture and the support desk both sit on Plus

ExpenseIt is the feature that reads a photographed receipt and builds the line item for you. The User Support Desk is where your staff go when a submission will not go through. Both arrive on Plus, at roughly eleven dollars a report against roughly seven on Base. Base is the tier most published comparisons are priced against, and it is the tier without the two things that decide whether anybody enjoys using it.
Icon representing travel booking sold as a separate quoted product

Travel is a different product, and it is quoted rather than listed

Concur Travel is where the booking half of the story lives, and it belongs to Premium, which carries no published price at all. If travel booking is the reason Concur is on your list, the tiers with a number attached are not the ones you would be buying. Get the Premium quote before you compare anything, because the two published figures describe a product you may not end up with.
One figure that holds, and one that moves every time somebody files
A per report fee buys the software. It does not buy anybody to run it.
The gap here is not the rate. Seven dollars a report is fair for what it is. The gap is that the number is variable and the work is still yours. Concur hands you a capable expense platform and leaves the policy design, the approval routing, the integrations and the maintaining with you. We do that part, keep doing it, and put a named person behind it.

Cascadia

Zoho Expense configured around your policy limits, your approval chain and your mileage and per diem rules, then wired into Zoho Books so a claim arrives as a reimbursement and a ledger entry rather than a PDF in somebody's inbox. Five hundred dollars a month, flat, whether ten reports come in or four hundred.

Without Cascadia

Three tiers, one of which publishes no price at all. A fee on every report filed, receipt capture and the staff support desk held back to the middle tier, travel sold as a separate quoted product, and no way to buy any of it without a sales call. Everything after signature is yours to set up and keep running.

Comparison

Cascadia vs Concur
Concur charges by the report and we charge by the month, so a rate against a rate would tell you very little on its own. This table compares what each side is responsible for. Everything in the Cascadia column is included in Managed Zoho Expense at one flat monthly figure.

Someone sits with the people who file and approve claims and turns how they work into policy limits, categories and approval routes

Someone writes the policy rules, the rejection wording and the reminder cadence, then tests what a real submitter actually sees

Limits, categories and approval chains reviewed every month against the claims that actually came in

A price that does not move when the team files twice as many reports this quarter

The same named person every time, who configured your expense policy and remembers why

One expense policy every department agreed on, instead of five managers each approving to their own standard

One monthly figure with no report count attached and no annual commitment

The claim, the approval, the reimbursement and the ledger entry living in one system

An honest no on the first call if a spreadsheet and a shared folder really are all you need

Reporting that joins the claim to the project, the customer and the ledger without a connector in between

Generic logo representing a comparable provider.
Concur

Where Concur fits

If you carry a large headcount and only a handful of people file anything, billing by the report is the right shape and Concur will cost you less than we do. It gets harder to recommend the moment submitting becomes routine across the whole team, because the thing that grows the bill is the behaviour you were trying to encourage.
Cascadia Web Services logo

Cascadia Web Services

Where a per report fee stops being the thing that matters

We exist for the case where the claim is one step in an accounting process that also invoices, bills projects and closes a month, and nobody has the hours to wire that together.

Where Concur is strong

Icon representing multi currency coverage across several tax jurisdictions
The global coverage is deeper than anything we would build for you
Multi currency, VAT and GST reclaim, and audit trails built for organisations filing in several jurisdictions at once. SAP has been doing this at that scale for a very long time. If your expense problem is genuinely international and compliance led, that depth is worth paying for and we are not going to pretend we match it.
Icon representing travel booking and expense capture joined in one product
Travel booking and expense in one product is a real product decision
Concur Travel puts the booking and the claim in the same system, so an itinerary becomes an expense without anybody retyping it. If your staff travel constantly, that is worth having. Zoho Expense does not book travel, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
Icon representing unlimited users on a plan that meters submissions instead
Unlimited users is a real advantage and we have no answer to it
Base and Plus both carry unlimited users. A firm with two hundred staff and fifteen regular filers pays for fifteen filers worth of reports, and nobody has to be left off the system to hold the cost down. If that describes you, Concur is the cheaper answer and we would say so on the first call.
Icon representing an established finance platform auditors already recognise
It is the platform your auditor and your accountant already know
Concur has been the default corporate expense system long enough that most accountants have used it, most auditors have seen its reports, and a great many travel policies were written with it in mind. That familiarity saves real time during an audit and it is not the sort of thing a feature table captures. It also does not tell you the tool is the one your business needs.
All of that is real, and if you are a large organisation with constant travel and occasional filers, Concur is a better answer than anything we sell. What it is not is a small finance team's whole month end. That is a different job, and it is the one our Managed Zoho work is built around.

What five hundred a month covers when the rate itself looks perfectly reasonable

Icon representing one monthly figure covering the configuration, the tuning and reporting
One number covering the build, the tuning and every change after it
Policy limits and categories, approval chains, mileage and per diem rates, receipt rules, card feeds and the Books connection. Built once, then changed whenever your policy, your staff or your entities change, with no ticket and no hourly rate.
Icon representing a flat figure with no report count behind it
No report count behind it, so a busy quarter does not change the invoice
Five hundred a month is the whole of it. Concur prices Base and Plus by the report, so the bill follows your submission volume upward and quarter end is the expensive month. Ours does not follow anything.
Icon representing the person who wrote the expense policy also answering about it
The person who wrote your expense policy is the person who picks up
You are not explaining your setup to somebody reading it for the first time. Concur runs a large support organisation, and the User Support Desk your staff would actually use is a Plus feature rather than a Base one. None of them wrote your policy.
Icon representing the claim inside the same suite as the ledger and the invoice
One suite, so today's claim is already this month's ledger entry
Zoho Expense sits alongside Books, CRM, Projects and People. The claim becomes an approval, a reimbursement and a ledger entry without an automation task in between.
Concur will handle a thousand travellers better than we will, and for an organisation that size buying anything else is a waste. The line is volume against headcount. Once everybody files and every claim has to land in the ledger correctly, the tool stops being the hard part and running it becomes the hard part.

Onboarding process

What the first sixty days look like when nobody has to own the setup

Most of the work is ours. Every platform on this hub will let somebody photograph a receipt and get reimbursed. What differs is who decides what can be claimed, by whom and up to what limit, and who comes back to it when the business changes.

1

Nothing gets built until we have followed one real claim from receipt through to reimbursement

We sit with whoever files the claims, and with whoever has to explain the number at month end, and we write down what happens to a receipt in practice rather than what the policy document says happens.

2

The claims in flight and the categories people actually use move first, and get checked before anyone files against them

The claims already submitted, the categories that get used every month, the approval chains that exist on paper and the different ones that exist in practice. Coming off an older expense system there is usually more history than anybody expects, and the time goes on agreeing which of the old categories and one off policy exceptions deserve to survive the move.

3

The categories, the limits and the approval routes get built around you, not left on defaults

Default categories produce a report nobody can read. We build the categories, the limits and the approval rules around how the business really spends, so the coding matches what your accountant actually needs at month end.

4

You run a full month on it, including a real month end and a real rejected claim

The first month of live claims runs with us alongside it. Anything that routes to the wrong approver or codes to the wrong account gets fixed while everybody still remembers the receipt it happened to.

Testimonials

Don't Take Our Word For It

Two situations where this decision actually gets made
These are scenarios, not client stories. If the business grows past what an expense tool and a Zoho estate can hold, the next step is managed ERPNext, and we would rather say that early than sell you a plan you outgrow.
Hands checking figures on a calculator against a stack of invoices

How this plays out

A firm whose expense bill grew because the process finally worked

Twelve people filed on paper, late and badly, so the finance lead bought a per report platform to fix it. It worked. Filing became easy, so everybody filed, and the monthly count went from a handful of reports to well over a hundred. The firm in this scenario did not object to paying. What they objected to was that the bill rose precisely because the process had started working, and that somebody still had to rewrite the approval routes every time a department changed.
A support agent taking a call at a laptop

When this comes up

A firm where the expense report was never really the point

Claims arrive, and then they have to become an approval, a reimbursement, a project cost and a ledger entry. On Concur that is an integration somebody has to specify, buy and maintain against whatever accounting system you run. Inside Zoho it is one record moving through the suite, which is the whole reason five hundred a month is worth spending.
500

Dollars a month, published on this page, whatever your submission volume does

Everything from the first read of how you spend through to the monthly reporting sits inside that figure. Zoho bills your licences to you directly at their published rates, and we take no margin on them.
0

Dollars per report, per user, per receipt scanned or per approval routed

The review, the configuration, the policy rules, the permissions and the reporting all sit inside the five hundred. Nothing is metered, there is no add on behind the setup and there is no tier above this one.
4-8

Weeks, usually, before the month closes cleanly without us in it

Four to eight weeks typically, and longer where years of spreadsheet claims and personal card statements have to be reconciled before anybody will trust the numbers the reports are showing.

Concur alternative and managed Zoho Expense FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Concur compare to Ramp, Expensify and Navan?
It is the enterprise one, and that is the most useful thing to know about it. The other three on this hub are built to be bought by the company itself, with a signup form and a published price. Concur is bought through a salesperson and metered by the expense report rather than by the person, which makes it the only one here whose bill is driven by activity instead of headcount. Ramp is free and earns on card interchange. Expensify charges per active member. Navan is travel led. Concur is the one that assumes you already have a finance department, a written travel policy and an auditor asking questions.
Can I just buy Concur online?
No. There is no self serve checkout on any tier. You request a quote or a demo and a salesperson takes it from there. The roughly seven dollars a report on Base and roughly eleven on Plus that circulate online come from SAP's own estimator rather than a price list, and what you are finally offered depends on volume, contract length and which modules you take. Budget for a procurement cycle, not a card payment.
What does Concur actually cost per month?
That depends entirely on how many reports your team files, which is the whole point of the model. On the published Base starting rate of about seven dollars a report, seventy reports a month comes to roughly five hundred dollars. On Plus at about eleven, it is closer to forty five reports. That is arithmetic on their own starting figures rather than a quote, so treat it as a shape and not a number. Count your real monthly submissions and multiply.
What counts as one expense report?
A submitted report, not a receipt and not a line item. Ten receipts bundled into one submission is one report. That matters more than it sounds, because it means how your team batches its claims changes your bill. A firm filing weekly pays roughly four times what the same firm pays filing monthly, for exactly the same spend. Ask SAP how they count before you model anything.
What do you only get on Concur Plus and Premium?
Plus adds ExpenseIt, which reads a photographed receipt and builds the line item, and the User Support Desk, which is where your staff go when a submission will not go through. Premium is quoted rather than listed, and it is where Concur Travel sits along with the deeper configuration and reporting. Base gives you expense capture, policy enforcement and approvals, and it is the tier most published comparisons are built on.
Concur works out cheaper than five hundred a month for us. Why would I pay you?
Then take Concur, and we mean that. If your team files fewer than about seventy reports a month, the Base rate is the cheaper answer and no argument from us changes the arithmetic. You should not pay us for the software. You pay us because the software is not the work. Somebody has to write the policy into the system, set the limits, build the approval routes, connect the platform to your accounting and rework all of it every time a department or an entity changes. Concur sells you the tool and leaves that part with you. If your team is happy owning it, keep your money.
At what point does Concur stop being cheaper?
Around seventy reports a month on the Base starting rate, and around forty five on Plus. Above that our flat five hundred is the lower number and the gap widens every month. Below it Concur wins, and we will tell you so. The part worth noticing is which way each curve runs. Concur rises as your team files more, which is exactly the behaviour a working expense process produces. Ours does not move at all. Get a real quote from SAP and redo the arithmetic with their number rather than ours.
Is Concur an expense tool or a travel system?
Both, and they are priced separately. The expense half is what Base and Plus cover. Concur Travel, which handles the booking itself, belongs to Premium and is quoted. If travel booking is the reason Concur is on your shortlist, the two tiers with published starting rates are not describing the product you would end up buying. Get the Premium number before you compare anything to anything.
Does Concur handle mileage and per diems?
Yes, and well. Mileage rates, per diem tables and multi currency are all standard, and the compliance depth across jurisdictions is genuinely better than anything we would build for a small team. If you file in several countries at once and an auditor cares about the detail, that is a real reason to choose Concur over anything else on this hub, including us.
Does Zoho Expense connect to the rest of Zoho?
That is the reason to choose it. Expense sits alongside Books, CRM, Projects and People, so a claim becomes an approval, a reimbursement, a project cost and a ledger entry without a connector holding the whole thing together.
What exactly do you do for five hundred a month?
We write your expense policy into the system, build the categories and the limits, set the approval chains and the delegation rules, configure mileage and per diem rates, set up card feeds and receipt rules, connect Expense to Books and to your other Zoho apps, and then keep tuning all of it as your policy and your staff change.
Do I need a Zoho subscription on top of your fee?
You need a Zoho plan that includes Expense, and that account is yours. We manage it, we do not resell it, and if you leave the account and the data stay with you.
Can you move us off Concur?
Yes. Categories, policy limits, approval chains, submitted history and your card feeds come across, and we build the equivalent in Zoho Expense before anything is switched over. The one thing to plan around is travel. If you are on Premium and booking through Concur Travel, Zoho Expense has no equivalent booking tool, so you would keep booking wherever suits and file the receipts with us.
Is there a minimum term?
No. Five hundred a month, month to month.
What if we only have two people?
Then file on Concur Base, or run Zoho Expense yourself, and keep your five hundred dollars. Two people filing a handful of claims a month is not a problem worth paying anyone to manage. Come back when month end starts costing somebody an afternoon a week.
What happens if we outgrow Zoho?
Some businesses do. Once expense is one small part of manufacturing, inventory or project accounting, the honest answer is ERPNext rather than another Zoho app, and we run that as well.
​Contact

Ask Us Anything

We’d love to hear from you!