On Page Navigation

A Dynamics 365 Business Central Alternative That Is Not Priced Per Person

Business Central publishes its price, which is more than most ERP vendors do. Eighty dollars per user per month for Essentials, one hundred and ten for Premium, paid yearly. Managed ERPNext is two thousand a month for the whole business, and hiring does not move it.
What Business Central publishes, and what the number leaves out
A real list price, quoted per person and before anybody implements it
Business Central is the only ERP on this hub that prints a number. Essentials is eighty dollars per user per month paid yearly, Premium is one hundred and ten, and a Team Members seat with limited rights is eight. That is the licence. The same page then tells you to contact a partner to purchase, and the footnote underneath says the figures are informational and your actual price appears at checkout.
Icon representing a published list price quoted per user per month

The price is public, and it is per person

Eighty dollars per user per month on Essentials, paid yearly. Their comparison table lists unlimited users as included on both tiers, which means there is no cap on how many you may license rather than that the extra ones arrive free. A team of twenty five is two thousand dollars a month for the licence alone.
Icon representing two licence tiers separated by manufacturing and service orders

Two tiers, separated by exactly two things

Premium adds service order management and manufacturing. Everything else is identical, and finance, sales, purchasing, inventory, supply chain planning, projects, warehousing, multiple companies and multiple environments all sit inside Essentials. If one department needs manufacturing, the higher rate applies to every licensed user rather than to that department.
Icon representing AI agents requiring separate credits and a cloud subscription

The agents are a separate purchase, and so is Azure

The Sales Order Agent and the Payables Agent both carry the line requires Copilot Credits, sold separately. Copilot Studio is bought up front as Commit Units or taken pay as you go, and an Azure subscription is required to use agents at all. That is a second vendor relationship sitting behind the one you thought you were buying.
Two routes to the same job, with the bill assembled differently
Business Central will tell you the price. It will not tell you the total
On one side sits a Microsoft platform with a published per user rate, sold through a partner who implements it and quotes that work separately, with an Azure subscription and Copilot Credits behind the agents. On the other sits an open source ERP with no licence at all, where one monthly figure covers the configuration, the hosting and the support, and does not move when you hire.

Cascadia

ERPNext shaped around the way your business already works, hosted on Frappe Cloud, and looked after by the same people who set it up. Configuration, customization, development, hosting and support arrive together on one monthly invoice.

Without Cascadia

A mature Microsoft platform with a published rate, two licence tiers, a partner to implement it and an Azure subscription behind the agents. What it asks of you first is a headcount, and then the same headcount again every time it changes.

Comparison

Cascadia vs Dynamics 365 Business Central
Every row below is about the shape of the bill rather than the quality of the software. Business Central is a capable system and nothing here disputes that. Every cross marks something the licensing model makes awkward rather than something the product does badly, and since Microsoft does publish a rate, nothing in it is a complaint about secrecy either. All of the work in it is covered by our managed ERPNext service.

Adding somebody to the team does not change the monthly figure

No software licence fee at all, because the ERP underneath it is open source

Implementation, hosting and ongoing support inside one monthly figure

Turning on manufacturing does not reprice every user in the business

AI features without a second vendor, a cloud subscription and a credit balance

The people who configured it are the same people you call afterwards

Source code you can read, fork and keep running if you stop paying us

Month to month, rather than an annual subscription with a renewal date on it

Being told plainly to buy Business Central and skip us entirely

Full access for everybody, rather than a cheaper seat that can only read and approve

Generic logo representing a comparable provider.
Dynamics 365 Business Central

Where Business Central fits

If you already run on Microsoft 365, have a manufacturing or service operation, and want an ERP that shares an identity provider and a spreadsheet with everything else you own, buy Business Central and skip us. Below about ten users it is also plainly cheaper, and we would rather say that here than argue around it.
Cascadia Web Services logo

Cascadia Web Services

Where the licence grows faster than the business

We are for the case sitting underneath that one, where a single set of books, one country to file in and a team that keeps growing make a per person licence the most expensive part of the decision. If half the people who need access will open it twice a week, you are still buying all of them a seat.

Where Business Central is strong

Icon representing a published rate printed on a vendor pricing page
A published rate, in a market that mostly refuses to print one
Essentials at eighty dollars per user per month and Premium at one hundred and ten sit on the pricing page in plain text. The other three platforms on this hub send you to a partner instead. Being able to build a rough budget before the first call is worth something, and Microsoft is the only one of the four that lets you.
Icon representing a lower cost seat for staff who only read and approve
A cheaper seat for the people who only approve things
Team Members is eight dollars per user per month and covers reading data, approving workflows and creating or updating select information. If most of your team touches the system twice a week, that tier is genuinely well judged, and it is the part of their pricing model we would keep.
Icon representing a large partner channel of implementation firms
The largest partner channel in this market, by a distance
Microsoft sells through partners everywhere, so there is a deep market of firms who implement Business Central for a living and a second one available when the first disappoints. Whatever else is true about the arrangement, you will not struggle to find somebody.
Icon representing an ERP sitting inside an existing Microsoft 365 estate
It sits inside the rest of Microsoft, and that part is not marketing
If your business already runs on Microsoft 365, the identity, the spreadsheets and the mail are there already, and Business Central lands inside them rather than beside them. Copilot is included in the Essentials plan. That integration is real, and no amount of ERPNext configuration reproduces it.
All of that stands and none of it is grudging. Business Central is a serious product from a serious vendor, it prints a rate when most of this market will not, and the partner channel behind it is the largest of the four platforms on this hub. This page turns on one thing only, which is what the bill does when the business grows.

What two thousand a month buys when nobody is counting seats

Icon representing one monthly figure covering implementation, hosting and support
One figure covering the configuration, the hosting and the support afterwards
Implementation, configuration, customization, development, Frappe Cloud hosting and ongoing support sit inside two thousand a month. There is no seat count to declare, no tier to move between and no separate implementation quote arriving from somebody else. One figure, one company, and the same number in month twenty as in month one.
Icon representing open source software carrying no licence fee at all
The software licence is zero, and it stays zero as the business grows
ERPNext is open source. There is no seat licence and no tier licence, so neither hiring somebody nor switching on manufacturing changes what the software costs. Business Central does the opposite on both counts, and that is most of the difference between the two arrangements.
Icon representing the implementer and the support desk being the same people
The people who configured your books are the people who answer the phone
Microsoft licenses the software and a partner implements it, which is two companies and two contracts. When something is wrong in month nine, working out which of them owns it becomes your job. Here it is one company and one number, and there is nobody to hand you on to.
Icon representing a monthly agreement with no annual licence commitment behind it
Month to month, so the second year is a decision rather than a renewal
Business Central list prices are quoted paid yearly. Two thousand is a monthly figure that ends on thirty days notice, and the fit review that decides whether ERPNext suits your business at all happens before any of it is signed.
Microsoft will license you a capable ERP at a rate you can read, put a partner in front of it to make it work, and charge you again for every person you hire. Our case is about the arithmetic underneath that. What a system costs should follow the shape of a business rather than its headcount, two thousand a month does not move with either, and the same reasoning runs underneath the rest of our managed Frappe services.

Onboarding process

What the first ninety days look like when nobody sits in the middle

The work is mostly ours. Configuration refuses to be hurried, and a licence billed per person makes it tempting to hurry anyway, because every week of implementation is a week of seats already being paid for. Nothing here is billed by the seat, so the pace is set by the business rather than by the invoice.

1

Nothing gets configured until we have watched how the business actually runs

We sit with whoever raises the invoices, books the stock and chases the payments, and write down what they do step by step, including the parts nobody has ever documented. What starts each process, what it touches, and what it costs you when it goes wrong.

2

Your data gets migrated and reconciled before anybody is asked to trust it

Chart of accounts, customers, suppliers, items, open balances and transaction history all move across, then get reconciled against your existing system until the two agree. Nobody is asked to work in ERPNext while the numbers still disagree.

3

Only the parts of the system your business uses get switched on

ERPNext ships with a great deal more than most businesses need. Accounting, selling, buying, stock, manufacturing, projects, assets and HR are all in there, and leaving the unused ones off makes the system quicker to learn. Nothing about that decision moves the price.

4

You run a full period in it, and somebody signs off the first close

The first month end runs inside ERPNext with us alongside, and every report gets checked against what the old system would have produced. Training happens on your own data rather than on a demo company.

Testimonials

Don't Take Our Word For It

Two ways an ERP decision goes wrong with nobody behaving badly
Two situations with one thing in common. In both the software was sound, the vendor published its rate, and nobody made an obvious mistake. What was missing each time was a number that stayed still. If you are reading these and still choosing a first proper accounts system, our managed Zoho Books service is where that decision usually starts.
Hands checking figures on a calculator against a stack of invoices

How this plays out

The seat count grew during implementation, and so did the invoice

The first estimate was priced for twelve people. By go live there were nineteen, because warehouse staff needed stock lookups and two managers needed approvals nobody had thought about. Nobody miscounted. Who touches an ERP is genuinely hard to know before you have watched the business run, and on a per person licence that discovery arrives with a monthly cost attached.
A stack of paperwork with no order anybody could follow

When this comes up

Manufacturing arrived in one department, and the whole company changed tier

A single production line went in during year two. Manufacturing sits in Premium rather than Essentials, so the rate for every licensed user moved from eighty dollars to one hundred and ten, including the people in sales and finance who will never open it. Nothing went wrong with the software. The tier boundary simply did not follow the shape of the business.
2,000

Dollars a month, with the implementation, the hosting and the support already inside it

Everything from the first walk through to the monthly report sits inside that figure. Priority at four thousand adds two concurrent requests, faster turnaround, a quarterly planning session and up to three sites.
0

Dollars of software licence, whether two people use it or forty

ERPNext is open source, so the software itself costs nothing and adding somebody to it costs nothing either. No onboarding charge, no minimum term, and two thousand is a monthly figure rather than an annual commitment with a renewal date on it.
6-12

Weeks, in most cases, before your first month end closes inside ERPNext

Six to twelve weeks to a first clean close in most cases, and longer where stock, manufacturing or several years of history are in scope. Configuration starts the week we begin rather than after a discovery phase you pay for separately.

Dynamics 365 Business Central alternative and managed ERPNext FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Dynamics 365 Business Central alternative?
Anything that runs finance, stock, purchasing and sales on one system instead of several. That covers the other licensed platforms on this hub, NetSuite, Odoo and Acumatica included, the mid market accounting packages people outgrow, and open source ERP. The useful distinction is not the feature list, because most of these systems do the same things. It is how the bill is assembled: per person, per application, per transaction, or per business.
How is Cascadia different from Business Central?
They license software per person. We run a system for a business. Microsoft sells the licence, a partner implements it and quotes that work separately, an Azure subscription sits behind the agents, and your monthly figure is a multiplication of headcount. We charge one amount that covers the implementation, the configuration, the hosting on Frappe Cloud and the support afterwards, and the number of people using it is not part of the calculation.
How does your price compare to theirs?
We are two thousand a month for Standard and four thousand for Priority, billed monthly. Business Central is eighty dollars per user per month for Essentials and one hundred and ten for Premium, both paid yearly, plus a partner to implement it, plus Azure and Copilot Credits if you want the agents. Twenty five Essentials users is two thousand dollars a month before anybody has been paid to put it in.
Is Business Central cheaper than this?
Below about ten users, almost certainly yes, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. Ten Essentials seats is eight hundred dollars a month against our two thousand. What that figure excludes is the implementation, which a partner quotes separately and which is rarely small. The crossover sits somewhere around twenty five people, and it moves in our favour every time you hire.
Why pay this when Business Central publishes a lower number?
Because the published number is the licence and not the system. Microsoft's own footnote says the prices shown are informational and your actual price appears at checkout, and the header on the same page tells you to contact a partner to purchase. The implementation, the configuration and the support all sit outside the eighty dollars. Ours sit inside the two thousand, and the two thousand does not move when the team does.
Why not install ERPNext and run it ourselves?
You can, and there is nothing to license. ERPNext is open source and Frappe Cloud will host it for a modest monthly fee, so the software and the server were always the cheap part. What goes wrong is not the install. It is the chart of accounts, the tax setup, the stock valuation method and the opening balances, and those want somebody who has done it before.
Should we buy this at all?
Often not, and now is a far better time to establish that than month six. If your accounting package still holds, your stock lives in one place and nobody is rekeying between systems, an ERP is a solution looking for a problem. If you are already inside Microsoft 365 and the answer turns out to be yes, Business Central is a reasonable place to look before you look at us. The free fit review exists to reach that answer honestly rather than to sell past it.
Do we have to migrate everything at once?
No. Finance usually goes first, because that is where reconciliation matters and where the benefit shows up soonest. Stock, purchasing, projects or HR follow when they are ready. Running ERPNext alongside your existing system for a period is normal rather than a compromise.
Does anything break while you take over?
Nothing on your side goes dark. Your current system keeps running until the numbers in ERPNext reconcile against it, and nobody is asked to switch while the two still disagree. The migration runs on a copy first, and the copy is what gets checked.
What if we already run ERPNext and it was set up badly?
That is a common way people arrive here, and it is real work rather than a tidy up. We read the chart of accounts, the tax setup, the stock valuation method, the naming series and every customization, then tell you what is worth keeping and what should be rebuilt. Sometimes the answer is a fresh instance with the data migrated into it.
Do you own the system or the data?
No to both, and this is the question the whole page turns on. ERPNext is open source, so the software is nobody's property to withhold. The instance is yours, the database is yours, and every configuration we write is yours. Stop paying us and the system keeps running.
What is included at each tier?
Two flat tiers and no meter behind either of them. Standard at two thousand covers implementation, configuration, customization, development, Frappe Cloud hosting and ongoing support on one site. Priority at four thousand adds two concurrent requests, faster turnaround, a quarterly planning session and a higher development allowance. Neither tier counts users, modules or transactions, so nothing you do inside the system changes what either one costs.
Do you guarantee the implementation will go to plan?
No, and treat anybody who does with suspicion. A migration turns up data problems that predate all of us, a process nobody documented behaves differently in month two, and a real requirement gets discovered late. What we do guarantee is that the price does not move when any of that happens.
What does the monthly report actually contain?
What changed in the system, what we built or configured, what is still fragile and what we intend to do about it, plus anything in the ERPNext release notes upstream that will affect you. It runs on a rolling month rather than a calendar one.
How long before we see a difference?
Six to twelve weeks to a first clean month end in most cases, and longer where stock, manufacturing or several years of history are in scope. The first thing people notice is usually not the software. It is that nobody is rekeying anything.
What if I want to leave?
Thirty days notice ends it and nothing is stranded. The instance, the data and the source code were always yours, so there is no migration and nothing at all to hand back. What stops is us, and you would need somebody else to do what we were doing.
​Contact

Ask Us Anything

We’d love to hear from you!